SGCommand
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:
   
 
:I don't know. The comparison chart seems to just be full of empty spaces. Maybe some images... Anyway it's a cretive idea, but I don't think it's really necessary and, even though it's a great idea, the outcome doesn't really look that well as it is now.—[[User:Swedish guy|Swedish guy]] 22:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 
:I don't know. The comparison chart seems to just be full of empty spaces. Maybe some images... Anyway it's a cretive idea, but I don't think it's really necessary and, even though it's a great idea, the outcome doesn't really look that well as it is now.—[[User:Swedish guy|Swedish guy]] 22:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
  +
  +
::I could clean it up by limiting it to a 303/304 comparison, since that's what I originally wanted it to be, I just included the 301/302s for completeness. Or I could split it into two charts, a battlecruiser and a starfighter chart, because a lot of the blank spaces result from things that apply to one but not the other. I don't want to trash it completely if I can help it (unless everyone really thinks I should) cause it's something I was looking for for quite a while but could never find. Some images isn't a terrible idea... [[User:Cmantito|Cmantito]] 02:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:28, 30 January 2009

Sorry for doing it, but the image is pushing the Main ships part down, making it look completely random. Do you have any objections if i remove it?

Well, on just about every article that has an image, there is normally an image at the top right, that is how things work. It only pushes down a little. However, the image should be kept and not removed from the article. -- Matthew R Dunn 20:25, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Well, then I just have to change tactic (Don't worry, it'll probably be good for the article and the image will stay there).
Look, now the image is there, the Main ships part looks normal and the article has even more information. Everybody's happy.

What do you guys think of the new Role(s) part for the "Main Ships" section?

It's nice.—Anubis 10545 20:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Wow, I'm impressed, you definately worked hard on this. Excellent work on expanding this and the Tau'ri page. ;) -- Matthew R Dunn 21:24, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I just can't understand how the Tau'ri page could've be so short before.

F-302 Squadrons

Have they said at any time during the show the name of the squadrons of F-302s. I mean, in Ethon, there was blue squadron, but I've never heard of "Snakeskinners" or "Wraithwaxers".—Anubis 10545 09:31, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Decks

How many decks do any of you estimate are on the 303, 304. To help with the estimations. I know this ship is from star trek. Voyager is 66m high and it only has 15 decks. The 303 is 65m high so it might have 14 decks. I hope it has more. On one of the episodes the elevator had twenty seven visible buttons. The 304 is 75m high so it might have 24 decks. so any estimations for the 303, and the 304.

Actually, there was 28 buttons on the X-303's elevators. This was the same number as in the SGC, so I doubt the ship actually had 28 decks. 14 sounds about right... and 24 for 304s does too. I don't know the actual number though.—Anubis 10545 08:04, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Comparison Chart

I made a types of ship comparison chart and added it to the page, but the layout didn't come out looking like I hoped. If anyone has any tips for reshaping it, I'm open to suggestions =) Cmantito 20:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't know. The comparison chart seems to just be full of empty spaces. Maybe some images... Anyway it's a cretive idea, but I don't think it's really necessary and, even though it's a great idea, the outcome doesn't really look that well as it is now.—Swedish guy 22:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
I could clean it up by limiting it to a 303/304 comparison, since that's what I originally wanted it to be, I just included the 301/302s for completeness. Or I could split it into two charts, a battlecruiser and a starfighter chart, because a lot of the blank spaces result from things that apply to one but not the other. I don't want to trash it completely if I can help it (unless everyone really thinks I should) cause it's something I was looking for for quite a while but could never find. Some images isn't a terrible idea... Cmantito 02:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)