(Replaced content with "For an '''archive''' of this talk page, for the sake of viewing previous discussions before 2012, click '''here'''. {{Featured}}") |
(→Travel direction: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
For an '''archive''' of this talk page, for the sake of viewing previous discussions before 2012, click '''[[Talk:Stargate/Archive-2013|here]]'''. |
For an '''archive''' of this talk page, for the sake of viewing previous discussions before 2012, click '''[[Talk:Stargate/Archive-2013|here]]'''. |
||
{{Featured}} |
{{Featured}} |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Travel direction == |
||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Travel direction == |
||
| + | |||
| + | The article says that the one-way travel of matter is a technological limitation, not a property of the wormhole. The show seems to indicate otherwise. Carter even comments on wormhole directionality in an academic setting in “[[Prodigy (episode)|Prodigy]]”. A fundamental property of wormholes makes more sense than gates only being able to deconstruct or reconstruct, especially since that’s contradicted by the shows several times. [[User:Alecperkins|Alecperkins]] <sup>([[User talk:Alecperkins|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Alecperkins|Contribs]])</sup> 17:35, May 7, 2014 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 17:35, 7 May 2014
For an archive of this talk page, for the sake of viewing previous discussions before 2012, click here.
Travel direction
Travel direction
The article says that the one-way travel of matter is a technological limitation, not a property of the wormhole. The show seems to indicate otherwise. Carter even comments on wormhole directionality in an academic setting in “Prodigy”. A fundamental property of wormholes makes more sense than gates only being able to deconstruct or reconstruct, especially since that’s contradicted by the shows several times. Alecperkins (talk) (Contribs) 17:35, May 7, 2014 (UTC)