FANDOM


Line 15: Line 15:
   
 
But if sending replicators to space kills them, how do replicators ships works? They seem to be made of the same blocks after all.
 
But if sending replicators to space kills them, how do replicators ships works? They seem to be made of the same blocks after all.
+
:replicators don't get killed by exposure to space. by replicator ships, i presume you mean the milky way/ida replicators, which are based on a different architecture than the asurans. asuran ships, as stated by ellis in [[First Strike]], aren't built from blocks or nanites. {{User:Asdf1239/sig}} 09:47, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
   
   

Revision as of 09:47, January 12, 2011

There's something wrong here. Dumping them into space was meant to be a permanent solution. However, Niam was floating in space for months and functioned perfectly afterwards, which means Weir could be "reactivated" later.--Amitakartok 18:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Why didn't they just fly a ship to those coordinates and beam Weir in?

Maybe they couldn't get rid of her nanites without killing her? Plus she said (or at least referred to) in Adrift that she'd be rather dead than being half-replicator.--Amitakartok (talk) (Contribs) 15:00, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
Wier is pretty much dead in most understandings of the term, she had lost her mind and now she lost her body only leaving whatever shreds of the personality that were left to be ascended along with the collective replicator consciousness and then descended into FRAN, so really after all that all that was left was an android that had a few copied bits of Elizabeth Weir's personality.--99.141.187.4 01:49, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
her mind is still preserved in the replicator body, just frozen and inert in space. ASDF1239 DISCUSSION 04:18, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
No, she's dead. The replicator body only contains an electronic copy of her memories and personality-influencing genes and processes them to make a copy of her personality, it's not Wier, it's just a really clever piece of Lantean programming. All this "Mind transferring" in nonsense, it's just a copy that seems to kill the original. And that applies to the Asgard too, unless they have a brain transplant, which is entirely possible. Sman789 (talk) (Contribs) 11:23, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
the repli-weir/fran is clearly sentient, the original may be dead in which case it's a clone. but either way it's "alive" and can be reactivated. ASDF1239 DISCUSSION 20:12, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

it depends on what you mean by 'dead'. I think that Weir is just in a form of stasis. She can easily be reactivated again. Who she is resides in the replicator body. She is very much alive. If you consider having your original corporeal body necessary to be alive, then she is dead. No matter what, who she is is alive in a replicator body, so I say she is alive.

The asgard could have been put into replicator bodies but I doubt they would have wanted that after all the crap that the replicators have done to the three galaxies. —SupremeCommander (talk) (Contribs) 00:04, August 17, 2010 (UTC)


But if sending replicators to space kills them, how do replicators ships works? They seem to be made of the same blocks after all.

replicators don't get killed by exposure to space. by replicator ships, i presume you mean the milky way/ida replicators, which are based on a different architecture than the asurans. asuran ships, as stated by ellis in First Strike, aren't built from blocks or nanites. ASDF1239 DISCUSSION 09:47, January 12, 2011 (UTC)


Spacegate direction

I wonder how the Puddlejumper could survive the Spacegate travel as they where approching it from the behind.

First we see they are coming from the Planet Gates as Weir crashes the System and bounce the puddle jumper off the gate. The gate realign it as it was before the bump.

After that the Puddle Jumper approch the Spacegate from the different side as they where heading to the Rings.

As far as I know it is not possible to travel through a Gate from both sides. So how did they do it, or did I just saw it wrong ?195.37.117.1 09:05, October 27, 2010 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.