Did someone manage to count how many people were left behind on this planet? And Caine was left there too, right? --Глючарина (talk) (Contribs) 11:41, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

11 and counting Edit

i counted 15 on planet and 11 returned via da shuttle (excluding Young). Although i think dis fact is gonna be subject is gonna be open some discussion. Stargate TL1 (talk) (Contribs) 12:49, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

I think they are going to play a part in the season finale.

Or, for example, in Awakening. They said that they spent much money to special effects, maybe its about unimaginable megaaliens from this episode? That would make sense. --Глючарина (talk) (Contribs) 16:02, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

Or in to be fair in Mallozzi saying that the season finale will be the biggest HOLY #%&@!" he ever wrote. It could be anything that is HOLY #%&@!". Example, The ancients as

ascended being may help them. Or god might help them. The biggest HOLY #%&@!" in syfy seems to lean toward a Battlestar Galactica RDM style finale than Aliens coming back mostly because it is kinda old. Syfylover (talk) (Contribs) 16:26, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

I'm actually surprised that no character mentioned the possibility of the Ancient's involvement. They have already mentioned ascension so it can't be because they're trying to get rid of the unbelievable parts of the franchise. Sman789 (talk) (Contribs) 19:55, April 19, 2010 (UTC)
God, what a joke—IonutRO (talk) (Contribs) 21:22, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

I find the idea of there being a something in the everything highly likely. If the universe is everything why can't there be a god.Syfylover (talk) (Contribs) 21:33, April 23, 2010 (UTC) Anyone think that it may have been someone better than the Ancients? Maybe these guys live on a higher, higher plain of existance above the Ancients? Just a thought. :) --Donovan-j-charlie (talk) (Contribs) 09:01, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Planet's Origins Edit

Rogue Planets float through space. The way someone explained it to me, a star is a giant fusion bomb that keeps going off. That would be easy to create. So create a star, throw a rogue planet in there and warm it up some. Instant star system. --Pyroslev (talk) (Contribs) 12:15, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

That's a far cry from creating a world with a stable biosphere. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 02:54, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
True. Warming a rogue planet and terraforming it isn't totally out of possibility. The Gadmeer terraformer could do it. So star creation wouldn't be terribly hard. Something the Aschen did. Aschen plus Gadeemer technology Plus a rogue planet. Star system. --Pyroslev (talk) (Contribs) 18:48, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
It is just highly unlikly. The rouge planet will be a ball of ice with no atmosphere. All you would have to do is created get the planet orbiting a star in the "goldielocks" zone wait a few hundred thousand years and you have your self a planet similar to Earth.A scotsman (talk) (Contribs) 04:45, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
Asgard could collapse a star into a black hole- it would be easy to collapse a hydrogen nebula into a star using same tech (In less than year, probably weeks would do). Planet is a bit more difficult but still it was one and single object circling around the star- One could simply borrow it from another close star system using same gravitic technology... it would take few decades to pass betweeen star systems. (but that can be set in motion far sooner than star is "built"). Most time consuming effort would be creation of biosphere. No animals were shown and plants could be grown in under 30-40 years. Not counting ossibility of time dilation devices. which make general timeframe quite irrelevant. There goes "all powerfull aliens" or "God", Asgard knowledge and some base resources would be enough to build it. Significant energy investment on the other hand you have a planet that should be habitable for billions of years. Paeris (talk) (Contribs) 21:09, November 17, 2010 (UTC)

starting to smell like furlings Edit

While it is most unfortunate that SG1 turned the secretive last fourth great race into a joke, doesn't it seem more than a bit possible that the furlings were at hand in the making of this planet. the only time we have seen a colony definitivly built by furlings was on a moon that must have been at least somewhat small than the planet it orbited yet had exactly the same gravity as an earth-like planet, perhaps because of some massive terraforming, that could have well been involved in the obelisk planet's construction. Right now its speculation but I hope that they can do at least some justice to the furlings (like if they do introduce them, rename them)-- 02:48, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

I don't think they would introduce them, simply because they're called Furlings :D Sman789 (talk) (Contribs) 16:15, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
It is a real shame actually, maybe if they hadn't made that stupid joke about them we may ignore what the name sounds like and take them seriously but they've done the damage, personally. I've always liked to think that the "furlings" are really some crazy techie guy who has some space-time communications device in his basement that allows him to communicate with anyone anywhere and he just steals secrets from the future and told them to the other Great Races so he could be respected, he also told some human guys to go to this planet and beam themselves to moon as part of a "utopia" for no reason other than because he can-- 00:12, May 15, 2010 (UTC)
we will never, ever see actual furlings in any element of the stargate franchise, i will give $100 to anyone who thinks otherwise if i turn out to be wrong. the writing/production crew is probably getting a kick out of reading all the wild speculation across the internet. ASDF1239 DISCUSSION 05:09, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
i take your challenge.--Escyos (talk) (Contribs) 06:30, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
Its certainly not the Furlings for a few very simple reasons. First, the Furlings were good, as per the Great Alliance. I know a lot of time has passed but turning evil seems unlikely to me. Second, if they were in the Great Alliance then, presumably, they would have had to have had a significant presence in or near the Milky Way. I guess it is possible they have retreated into very deep space, but I can't think of a single likely reason that they would do that and not at least retain some presnce near the Milky Way (which is presuably were their homeworld is). Third if they were in the Great Alliance, even if they only had Earth-Level technology, they would easily have surpassed the Destiny's level of technology by now, it is explicitly stated that not only are they not as advanced, but they are far from it. Looq (talk) (Contribs) 22:52, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
If the furlings were advanced enough to build the starsystem, why they were defeated by the goaulds drug-plants? And that obelisk looks very different from the furlings structures found on their planet (The gate-thingy etc. ) 04:17, December 9, 2010 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.