Tag: sourceedit |
|||
| (22 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
When voting, you can vote '''For''' or '''Against''' (please provide a reason if voting against, and preferably if voting for as well). Or you can add a '''Comment''' without actually voting. You can vote for any number of entries at once, but only with one vote per entry. |
When voting, you can vote '''For''' or '''Against''' (please provide a reason if voting against, and preferably if voting for as well). Or you can add a '''Comment''' without actually voting. You can vote for any number of entries at once, but only with one vote per entry. |
||
| − | You must be a registered user to vote. If you are an anonymous user, [http://stargate.wikia.com/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup register now] |
+ | You must be a registered user to vote. If you are an anonymous user, [http://stargate.wikia.com/index.php?title=Special:Userlogin&type=signup register now]- it's fast and easy. |
<!-- |
<!-- |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
--> |
--> |
||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | * '''Nominating and for'''. Just stumbled across this article and thought it was well written, detailed and informative. - {{User:Jenkins08/sig}} - - 07:16, December 1, 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Against'''. tense is wrong sometimes, grammatical errors, awkward wording in places —{{User:Asdf1239/sig}} 05:18, March 23, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''Against.''' I, for one, find Anubis' mothership to be one of the more disappointing ships in the franchise. It's big, and powerful, and pretty cool, but the article is below par, we've never really had specifics, and it got destroyed a bunch. It was a plot accelerant, nothing more. [[User:Myrrlyn|Myrrlyn]] <sup>([[User talk:Myrrlyn|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Myrrlyn|Contribs]])</sup> 12:10, April 27, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| − | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
==Recently featured articles== |
==Recently featured articles== |
||
| Line 34: | Line 23: | ||
<div style="border: 1px solid #aaa; background: #f0f0ff; padding: 5px"> |
<div style="border: 1px solid #aaa; background: #f0f0ff; padding: 5px"> |
||
This is an abbreviated '''archive''' of featured article nominations. For the complete archive, click [[:Category:Featured articles|here]]. Do not edit the sections below. |
This is an abbreviated '''archive''' of featured article nominations. For the complete archive, click [[:Category:Featured articles|here]]. Do not edit the sections below. |
||
| + | |||
| + | ===[[Phoenix Campaign]]=== |
||
| + | * '''Nominating and for'''. I'm going rouge on this one fellas; We haven't had a new featured article in years and, while I'm omitting the voting process, this one seem adequate. [[User:Anubis 10545|Anubis 10545]] <sup>([[User talk:Anubis 10545|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Anubis 10545|Contribs]])</sup> 04:59, August 13, 2015 (UTC) |
||
| + | * '''For'''. Short article but well written with enough pictures. [[User:Diabound00|Diabound00]] <sup>([[User talk:Diabound00|talk]])</sup> 02:50, August 21, 2015 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | * '''Nominating and for'''. Detailed information complemented with images. - [[User:Anubis 10545|Anubis 10545]] <sup>([[User talk:Anubis 10545|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Anubis 10545|Contribs]])</sup> 08:54, December 30, 2011 (UTC) |
||
| + | * '''For.''' A well written article. [[User:Oberoth20|Oberoth20]] <sup>([[User talk:Oberoth20|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Oberoth20|Contribs]])</sup> 03:43, March 14, 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | * '''For. '''Well written and a nice character. [[User:Portalier|Portalier]] <sup>([[User talk:Portalier|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Portalier|Contribs]])</sup> 13:57, August 22, 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | * '''For'''. A very nice article, i always tought Anubis was one of the best Goa'uld. [[User:Death Dealer 15|Death Dealer 15]] <sup>([[User talk:Death Dealer 15|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Death Dealer 15|Contribs]])</sup> 08:59, December 14, 2011 (UTC) |
||
===[[Brown (Lieutenant)]] (+3)=== |
===[[Brown (Lieutenant)]] (+3)=== |
||
| Line 57: | Line 61: | ||
===[[Lantean-Wraith war]] (+4)=== |
===[[Lantean-Wraith war]] (+4)=== |
||
| − | *'''Nominating and for'''. It was an |
+ | *'''Nominating and for'''. It was an important events in interstellar history and thought it was well written and detailed. - [[User:Blade Crimsonsun]] 01:25 March 29, 2010 (UTC) |
*'''For. '''I agree with everything mentioned above |
*'''For. '''I agree with everything mentioned above |
||
*'''For.''' Backstory for all of Atlantis. How can it not be featured? [[User:Myrrlyn|Myrrlyn]] <sup>([[User talk:Myrrlyn|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Myrrlyn|Contribs]])</sup> 12:05, April 27, 2010 (UTC) |
*'''For.''' Backstory for all of Atlantis. How can it not be featured? [[User:Myrrlyn|Myrrlyn]] <sup>([[User talk:Myrrlyn|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Myrrlyn|Contribs]])</sup> 12:05, April 27, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''for''' surprisingly it |
+ | *'''for''' surprisingly it doesn't have npov issues {{User:Asdf1239/sig}} 00:46, April 28, 2010 (UTC) |
===[[Battle of the Void]] (+3)=== |
===[[Battle of the Void]] (+3)=== |
||
| Line 67: | Line 71: | ||
*'''For'''. --[[User:Donovan-j-charlie|Donovan-j-charlie]] <sup>([[User talk:Donovan-j-charlie|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Donovan-j-charlie|Contribs]])</sup> 15:21, March 23, 2010 (UTC) |
*'''For'''. --[[User:Donovan-j-charlie|Donovan-j-charlie]] <sup>([[User talk:Donovan-j-charlie|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Donovan-j-charlie|Contribs]])</sup> 15:21, March 23, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | ===[[Tau'ri-Wraith war]] (+ |
+ | ===[[Tau'ri-Wraith war]] (+4)=== |
| − | *'''Nominating and For'''. Very well |
+ | *'''Nominating and For'''. Very well written & detailed. -[[User:Blade Crimsonsun|Blade Crimsonsun]] 02:24, 14 August 2009 (UTC) |
* '''For'''. Another great battle article.... {{User:Jenkins08/sig}} - - 07:19, December 1, 2009 (UTC) |
* '''For'''. Another great battle article.... {{User:Jenkins08/sig}} - - 07:19, December 1, 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Nominating and For'''. Gives a nice overview... —[[User:Anubis 10545|Anubis 10545]] <sup>([[User talk:Anubis 10545|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Anubis 10545|Contribs]])</sup> 18:32, February 14, 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Nominating and For'''. Gives a nice overview... —[[User:Anubis 10545|Anubis 10545]] <sup>([[User talk:Anubis 10545|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Anubis 10545|Contribs]])</sup> 18:32, February 14, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| ⚫ | |||
===[[Jennifer Keller]] (+6)=== |
===[[Jennifer Keller]] (+6)=== |
||
| Line 84: | Line 89: | ||
* '''For'''. Excellent work on the article, certainly has my vote, and I enjoyed reading it. Mind you I do notice some spelling errors, which would hopefully be taken care of. -- [[User:Matthew R Dunn|Matthew R Dunn]] <sup>([[User talk:Matthew R Dunn|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Matthew R Dunn|Contribs]])</sup> 01:03, October 9, 2009 (UTC) |
* '''For'''. Excellent work on the article, certainly has my vote, and I enjoyed reading it. Mind you I do notice some spelling errors, which would hopefully be taken care of. -- [[User:Matthew R Dunn|Matthew R Dunn]] <sup>([[User talk:Matthew R Dunn|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Matthew R Dunn|Contribs]])</sup> 01:03, October 9, 2009 (UTC) |
||
* '''For'''. Agreed for all the reasons above. Cheers. {{User:Ka'lel/sig}} - 02:46, October 9, 2009 (UTC) |
* '''For'''. Agreed for all the reasons above. Cheers. {{User:Ka'lel/sig}} - 02:46, October 9, 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ===[[The Daedalus Variations]] (+3)=== |
||
| − | * '''Nominating and for'''. I don't see anything saying episode guides aren't allowed, other wikis do it, so why don't we? Anyway, the episode is among one of the finest we have, fairly few images, good guide and some nice quotes. -- [[User:Matthew R Dunn|Matthew R Dunn]] 18:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | * '''For'''. Sure, it's a descriptive, well-written... article of one of the better Atlantis episodes.—[[User:Anubis 10545|Anubis 10545]] 18:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | * '''For'''. Great episode and well written article.-[[user:wraith runner|wraith runner]] |
||
| − | |||
| − | ===[[Battle of Atlantis]] (+3)=== |
||
| − | * '''Nominating and for'''. A nicely constructed article that describes the battle that Atlantis' entire 1st season practically lead up to. (And of course I pretty much rewrote the entire article... so, might as well vote for it :) —[[User:Anubis 10545|Anubis 10545]] 23:52, 21 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | * '''For'''. Agree, Anubis has done some more fine work (though I just helped it along a little). -- [[User:Matthew R Dunn|Matthew R Dunn]] 00:28, 23 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''For'''. Argeed, Very detailed and well writen. -- [[User:Blade Crimsonsun|Blade Crimsonsun]] 15:56, 13 June 2009 |
||
| − | |||
| − | ===[[Hive Ship]] (+4)=== |
||
| − | * '''Nominating and for'''. It's an awesome ship and a great article. —[[User:Swedish guy|Swedish guy]] 09:29, 1 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | * '''For'''. It's a vital ship, as well as being one of the, if not the, largest ship in the franchise. -[[User:Maybourne|Maybourne]] 13:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | * '''For'''. Anything to do with the wraith gets my attention. -[[User:bigchubbs99|bigchubbs99]] 11:28, 16 May 2009 (GMT) |
||
| − | * '''For'''."Packed full of Jam" with info.—[[User:Anubis 10545|Anubis 10545]] 18:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ===[[Todd]] (+3)=== |
||
| − | * '''Nominating and for'''. Very interesting to read with nice images.—[[User:Anubis 10545|Anubis 10545]] 05:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''For'''. Totally —[[User:Swedish guy|Swedish guy]] 08:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | *'''For'''. Great Article to read and great images —[[User:bigchubbs99|bigchubbs99]] 11:07, 24 April 2009 |
||
| − | |||
| − | ===[[Trofsky]] (+5)=== |
||
| − | * '''Nominating and for'''. Highly detailed for the two episodes he's been in, with some nice images. One of the nicer articles from early SG-1. -- [[User:Matthew R Dunn|Matthew R Dunn]] 16:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | * I wrote it, so I might as well vote '''for''' too. —[[User:Jaymach|Jaymach Ral'Tir]] <small>([[User talk:Jaymach|talk]])</small> 11:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | * '''For'''. Wow, that's pretty impressive.—[[User:Anubis 10545|Anubis 10545]] 17:20, 8 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | * '''For'''. Incredibly well written article, especially for a character who was in so few episodes. [[User:Darth armitage|Darth armitage]] 19:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | * '''For'''. Good stuff. [[User:Green tentacle|Green Tentacle]] <sup>([[User talk:Green tentacle|Talk]])</sup> 01:59, 28 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
</div> |
</div> |
||
Revision as of 13:52, 21 August 2015
| This page is for the nomination of featured articles. Click here to nominate images or quotes. |
If you see an article that is, in your opinion, very good, then here is the place to nominate it to be featured article shown on the main page.
At this point, the nomination system is deliberately kept simple. The article with the most votes (at least 3) is removed from this pool and placed on the main page, and remains there until the next article is featured. There is no queue involved. If a nominee remains in the pool for more than 4 months with an insufficient number of votes, the nominee will be removed. It may, however, be nominated again.
Nominations
Please add new nominations at the bottom of the page.
When voting, you can vote For or Against (please provide a reason if voting against, and preferably if voting for as well). Or you can add a Comment without actually voting. You can vote for any number of entries at once, but only with one vote per entry.
You must be a registered user to vote. If you are an anonymous user, register now- it's fast and easy.
Recently featured articles
This is an abbreviated archive of featured article nominations. For the complete archive, click here. Do not edit the sections below.
Phoenix Campaign
- Nominating and for. I'm going rouge on this one fellas; We haven't had a new featured article in years and, while I'm omitting the voting process, this one seem adequate. Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 04:59, August 13, 2015 (UTC)
- For. Short article but well written with enough pictures. Diabound00 (talk) 02:50, August 21, 2015 (UTC)
Bill Lee (+3)
- Nominating and for. Detailed information complemented with images. - Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 08:54, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
- For. A well written article. Oberoth20 (talk) (Contribs) 03:43, March 14, 2012 (UTC)
- For. Well written and a nice character. Portalier (talk) (Contribs) 13:57, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
Anubis (+4)
- Nominating and for. I really like Anubis and i think the article is well written with lots of pictures and he is the strongest bad guy ever.
Anubis 1996 T | C - For Very nice article about a system lord. Revan the Dark Lord of the Sith (talk) (Contribs) 15:14, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
- For I agree with those two above, very detailed for a character who only appeared in 11 episodes. Heru'ur 1996 (talk) (Contribs) 15:20, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
- For. A very nice article, i always tought Anubis was one of the best Goa'uld. Death Dealer 15 (talk) (Contribs) 08:59, December 14, 2011 (UTC)
Brown (Lieutenant) (+3)
- Nominating and for. Well written article about an original movie character; doubt it can get more complete. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 19:24, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
- For. I agree, very detailed for a character who only appeared in the original movie. Anubis 1996 T | C
- For. Yes, this article is quite glorious indeed. —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 23:29, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
Aftermath (+3)
- Nominating and for. Just to shake vote process a little. Also it is very nice and detailed article - Глючарина (talk) (Contribs) 15:25, October 11, 2010 (UTC)
- For accurate and well written.- VroengardRider March 6,2011
Ori (+3)
- Nominating and For. Very informative read, very well done in my opinion, and the Ori are the last of the Big Baddies that the SGC got to fight themselves. Mr White (talk) (Contribs) 01:08, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
- For. It's very nice article. Plus they are a major Big Bad. -4339shw (talk) (Contribs) 01:36, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Good article on one of Stargate's major enemies. - Bell'Orso (talk) (Contribs) 13:01, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
Larrin (+3)
- Nominating and for. It's not getting any more detailed. - Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:07, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Very nice —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 07:33, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
- for because you put in the "shoot too early" quote. ASDF1239 DISCUSSION 07:44, May 8, 2010 (UTC)
Lantean-Wraith war (+4)
- Nominating and for. It was an important events in interstellar history and thought it was well written and detailed. - User:Blade Crimsonsun 01:25 March 29, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I agree with everything mentioned above
- For. Backstory for all of Atlantis. How can it not be featured? Myrrlyn (talk) (Contribs) 12:05, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
- for surprisingly it doesn't have npov issues ASDF1239 DISCUSSION 00:46, April 28, 2010 (UTC)
Battle of the Void (+3)
- Nominating and for. Another really detailed and descriptive battle article. Well-written, and it thoroughly describes one of the better battles in SGA... not to mention those images and quotes. It's all good... (my own bias aside)—Anubis 10545 01:31, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- For. Wow yeah i agree with Anubis.. very detailed article.... User:Jenkins08/sig - - 07:19, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
- For. --Donovan-j-charlie (talk) (Contribs) 15:21, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
Tau'ri-Wraith war (+4)
- Nominating and For. Very well written & detailed. -Blade Crimsonsun 02:24, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. Another great battle article.... User:Jenkins08/sig - - 07:19, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
- Nominating and For. Gives a nice overview... —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 18:32, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Being my favorite topic --- MCWWolf359 (talk) (Contribs) 20:17, December 12, 2013 (UTC)
Jennifer Keller (+6)
- Nominating and for. I built on it, described just about every action she took, even in episode where you only see her say "hi" and then walk away. Nominating it. -- Matthew R Dunn 20:09, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- For. I am a really big Dr. Keller fan, and the article is good. --KellerLover9178 13:20, November 2009 (UTC)
- For. That is a pretty great article....—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 19:41, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
- For. Agreed, though I'm a bigger Beckett fan. Kal'el T | C - 19:55, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
- For. A good article indeed. - Bell'Orso (talk) (Contribs) 10:27, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
- For. Rodney's lucky ;_; —Supakillaii (talk) (Contribs) 10:40, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Air, Part 1 (+3)
- Nominating and for. A really detailed article, images.... and all that stuff. Somewhere, I think Ka'lel suggested that having an SGU featured article soon after it premiered would be.... a good thing and might attract viewers. It's not just because I slaved over it for hours that I'm suggesting it mind you :) It really is one of our most detailed episode descriptions... and I'm not just saying that to make myself feel good... mind you :) —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 00:11, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
- For. Excellent work on the article, certainly has my vote, and I enjoyed reading it. Mind you I do notice some spelling errors, which would hopefully be taken care of. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) (Contribs) 01:03, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
- For. Agreed for all the reasons above. Cheers. Kal'el T | C - 02:46, October 9, 2009 (UTC)