This page is for the nomination of featured articles. Click here to nominate images or quotes.

If you see an article that is, in your opinion, very good, then here is the place to nominate it to be featured article shown on the main page.

At this point, the nomination system is deliberately kept simple. The article with the most votes (at least 3) is removed from this pool and placed on the main page, and remains there until the next article is featured. There is no queue involved. If a nominee remains in the pool for more than 4 months with an insufficient number of votes, the nominee will be removed. It may, however, be nominated again.


Please add new nominations at the bottom of the page.

When voting, you can vote For or Against (please provide a reason if voting against, and preferably if voting for as well). Or you can add a Comment without actually voting. You can vote for any number of entries at once, but only with one vote per entry.

You must be a registered user to vote. If you are an anonymous user, register now- it's fast and easy.

Recently featured articles[]

This is an abbreviated archive of featured article nominations. For the complete archive, click here. Do not edit the sections below.

Phoenix Campaign[]

  • Nominating and for. I'm going rouge on this one fellas; We haven't had a new featured article in years and, while I'm omitting the voting process, this one seem adequate. Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 04:59, August 13, 2015 (UTC)
  • For. Short article but well written with enough pictures. Diabound00 (talk) 02:50, August 21, 2015 (UTC)

Bill Lee (+3)[]

Anubis (+4)[]

  • Nominating and for. I really like Anubis and i think the article is well written with lots of pictures and he is the strongest bad guy ever. Sym-anubisAnubis 1996 T | C
  • For Very nice article about a system lord. Revan the Dark Lord of the Sith (talk) (Contribs) 15:14, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
  • For I agree with those two above, very detailed for a character who only appeared in 11 episodes. Heru'ur 1996 (talk) (Contribs) 15:20, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
  • For. A very nice article, i always tought Anubis was one of the best Goa'uld. Death Dealer 15 (talk) (Contribs) 08:59, December 14, 2011 (UTC)

Brown (Lieutenant) (+3)[]

  • Nominating and for. Well written article about an original movie character; doubt it can get more complete. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 19:24, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
  • For. I agree, very detailed for a character who only appeared in the original movie. Sym-anubisAnubis 1996 T | C
  • For. Yes, this article is quite glorious indeed. —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 23:29, December 11, 2011 (UTC)

Aftermath (+3)[]

  • Nominating and for. Just to shake vote process a little. Also it is very nice and detailed article - Глючарина (talk) (Contribs) 15:25, October 11, 2010 (UTC)
  • For accurate and well written.- VroengardRider March 6,2011

Ori (+3)[]

  • Nominating and For. Very informative read, very well done in my opinion, and the Ori are the last of the Big Baddies that the SGC got to fight themselves. Mr White (talk) (Contribs) 01:08, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
  • For. It's very nice article. Plus they are a major Big Bad. -4339shw (talk) (Contribs) 01:36, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
  • For. Good article on one of Stargate's major enemies. - Bell'Orso (talk) (Contribs) 13:01, October 27, 2010 (UTC)

Larrin (+3)[]

Lantean-Wraith war (+4)[]

  • Nominating and for. It was an important events in interstellar history and thought it was well written and detailed. - User:Blade Crimsonsun 01:25 March 29, 2010 (UTC)
  • For. I agree with everything mentioned above
  • For. Backstory for all of Atlantis. How can it not be featured? Myrrlyn (talk) (Contribs) 12:05, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • for surprisingly it doesn't have npov issues ASDF1239 DISCUSSION 00:46, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Battle of the Void (+3)[]

  • Nominating and for. Another really detailed and descriptive battle article. Well-written, and it thoroughly describes one of the better battles in SGA... not to mention those images and quotes. It's all good... (my own bias aside)—Anubis 10545 01:31, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Wow yeah i agree with Anubis.. very detailed article.... Jenkins08 (Talk) - - 07:19, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
  • For. --Donovan-j-charlie (talk) (Contribs) 15:21, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

Tau'ri-Wraith war (+4)[]

  • Nominating and For. Very well written & detailed. -Blade Crimsonsun 02:24, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Another great battle article.... Jenkins08 (Talk) - - 07:19, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
  • Nominating and For. Gives a nice overview... —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 18:32, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
  • For. Being my favorite topic --- MCWWolf359 (talk) (Contribs) 20:17, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Jennifer Keller (+6)[]

  • Nominating and for. I built on it, described just about every action she took, even in episode where you only see her say "hi" and then walk away. Nominating it. -- Matthew R Dunn 20:09, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
  • For. I am a really big Dr. Keller fan, and the article is good. --KellerLover9178 13:20, November 2009 (UTC)
  • For. That is a pretty great article....—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 19:41, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Agreed, though I'm a bigger Beckett fan. Kal'el T | C - 19:55, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
  • For. A good article indeed. - Bell'Orso (talk) (Contribs) 10:27, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Rodney's lucky ;_; —Supakillaii (talk) (Contribs) 10:40, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

Air, Part 1 (+3)[]

  • Nominating and for. A really detailed article, images.... and all that stuff. Somewhere, I think Ka'lel suggested that having an SGU featured article soon after it premiered would be.... a good thing and might attract viewers. It's not just because I slaved over it for hours that I'm suggesting it mind you :) It really is one of our most detailed episode descriptions... and I'm not just saying that to make myself feel good... mind you :) —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 00:11, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Excellent work on the article, certainly has my vote, and I enjoyed reading it. Mind you I do notice some spelling errors, which would hopefully be taken care of. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) (Contribs) 01:03, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
  • For. Agreed for all the reasons above. Cheers. Kal'el T | C - 02:46, October 9, 2009 (UTC)