SGCommand:Nominations for featured articles

If you see an article that is, in your opinion, very good, then here is the place to nominate it to be featured article shown on the main page.

At this point, the nomination system is deliberately kept simple. The article with the most votes (at least 3) is removed from this pool and placed on the main page, and remains there until the next article is featured. There is no queue involved.

Nominations
Please add new nominations at the bottom of the page.

When voting, you can vote For or Against (please provide a reason if voting against, and preferably if voting for as well). Or you can add a Comment without actually voting. You can vote for any number of entries at once, but only with one vote per entry.

You must be a registered user to vote. If you are an anonymous user, register now - it's fast and easy.

$$$$

Teal'c (+2)

 * Nominating and for. I believe that this is a well written article. - User: Stickz 08:30, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Against. It's incomplete, lacking information from season 10 and Ark of Truth. - Sikon 03:47, 18 April 2008 (UTC) - objection withheld, now I'm neutral - Sikon 05:40, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 *  For . Who cares about 'Ark of Truth'.
 * For. It is as complete as can be expected, allowing those unfamiliar with the series to watch season 10 and 'Ark of Truth'. User:SupremeBlisseyFan 21:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * For. Like SBF said, this article really helped me make up for lost time. - Bell&#39;Orso 16:31, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Nicholas Ballard (+1-1)

 * Nominating and for. I think that this is an interesting article.
 * Nominating and for. I believe it is the best, written article on Nicholas Ballard here. - Stickz 08:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Against. Simply does not compare to for example the article Jay Felger, which is a very well-written article and, unlike the article in question here, totally deservant of its featured status. - Bell&#39;Orso 16:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Apollo (+3)

 * Nominating and for. Another great article on another great Tau'ri ship. Well-written and certainly not lacking in importance either. - Bell&#39;Orso 16:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * For. Well-written and certainly not lacking in importance, with nice images. - Anubis 10545 23:44, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * For. Same Reasons as Above Blade Crimsonsun 02:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

304 (+1-1)

 * Nominating and for. Like the respective articles on 3 of the 5 known ships of this type, this article is very well structured and very detailed. - Bell&#39;Orso 16:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Against. The article's good and all that stuff (it gets the job done), but it's nothing special when compared to other better articles.&mdash;Anubis 10545 23:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Meredith Rodney McKay (+1)

 * Nominating and for. One of the best character pages we have. —Swedish Guy 10:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * For. A really impressive article with much information and several nice pictures. I'm surprised it hasn't already been featured.&mdash;Anubis 10545 22:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Zero Point Module (+1)

 * Nominating and for. Very good article on a piece of technology singularly important to the plot of SG. - Bell&#39;Orso 13:12, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Past featured articles
This is an archive of featured article nominations. Do not edit the sections below.

Tollana (+4)
Featured - Sikon 14:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Nominating and for. As far as I know, this is simply the most elaborate article on a planet here, and Jaymach evidently put a lot of work into it. - Sikon 13:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * For- Very well written and lots of relevant pictures 23:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * For. There are many details and nice pictures about the planet. - Stickz 09:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * For I vote for this one too, shows a great skill on the writers part, plus i'm kinda fed up of seeing Hathor everyday. Drek258 22:28 GMT 24/04/08

Thor (+5)
Featured - Sikon 07:45, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Nominating and for. I think that this is a good article about Thor. - Stickz 10:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * For. Long and detailed, although I'd prefer more pictures. - Sikon 14:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * For, although I agree that it could do with some more images 07:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * For, Pretty good, even though I am from Zeldapedia, and a loyal fan of stargate. Mr kmil 5/1/08
 * For, Very detailed and well written. -Anubis 10545 5/1/08

Heliopolis (+3)
Featured - Sikon 16:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Nominating and for. Close call with Tollana in terms of detail. Tollana wins for me by a small margin, but I think this also deserves a nomination. - Sikon 13:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * For- Well written article, especially since it only appears in one episode 23:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * For- Good and long article with pictures that perfectly visualize the context. Diabound00 06:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * For- I believe that this is a well written article for a planet that only appeared in one episode. User: Stickz 15:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Against- Though this is a good article, the bulk of it could have been lifted from the page about the episode.

Jay Felger (+3)
Featured - Sikon 07:22, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Nominating and for I just find this to be a really good page. Drek258 16/05/08
 * For Well written for a minor character 04:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Nominating and for I always found him to be funny and I really enjoy the detail of his page. - Stickz 11:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Atlantis (+3)
Featured - Sikon 13:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Nominating and for. I'm surprised this page hasn't been featured yet. I think it is good to read and is well written.—Matthew R Dunn 22:48, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * For. Well written, detailed, and thorough. Anubis 10545 01:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Abstain. Wikipedia's article Atlantis (Stargate) is more detailed than this one. We should probably merge parts of it first. - Sikon 05:18, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * For. THis page has a lot of good info on the city.-User: Stickz 01:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Ra (+5)

 * Nominating and for. Self-explanatory. - Sikon 07:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * For. This article had very interesting details about Ra. - User:Stickz 01:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * For. Good to read, with a few nice pics in it as well. - Matthew R Dunn 12:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * For Same as above comments 23:43, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * For. Good article. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:48, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Odyssey (+5)

 * Nominating and for. Detailed about the events it engaged in, and good use of pictures. - Anubis 10545 04:42, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
 * For. To my knowledge this article has covered most of the details and all of the plots featuring the Odyssey. - User:Stickz 05:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * For. Very detailed.--Long Live the United Earth 00:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * For. Great article. - Bell&#39;Orso 16:04, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * For. I believe this article is very well written with pictures added to their respective events. - Pjotr NL 15:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Stargate (+4)

 * Nominating and for. A good article and considering that it's such a big part of the series it deserves to be nominated. —Swedish Guy 14:49, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * For. A good article indeed. - Bell&#39;Orso 13:55, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * For . Stargate SG-1, Stargate: The Ark of Truth, Stargate Atlantis, The first movie & Stargate Continuum are all based on been able to go through the Stargate, so I believe something this important should be able to get voted in as a feature article. Chevron 7 08:04, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * For. I like it. - User: Stickz 08:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Tau'ri (+3)

 * Nominating and for. Very detailed with well placed images. It covers practically all aspects of them. - Anubis 10545 19:25, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * For. A very detailed article with many good quality pictures.Swedish Guy 19:17, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * For. Very informative for people like me who didn't follow SG1 until later in its run. - Bell&#39;Orso 16:22, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Radek Zelenka (+4)

 * Nominating and for. Has just about all the information you need on this guy, interesting read. -- Matthew R Dunn 13:52, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * For. A very informative article, with small bits off humor mixed in.&mdash;Anubis 10545 17:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * For. Very informative —Swedish Guy 07:39, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * For. Very detailed and well-illustrated article on a fun guy, what do you want more? - Bell&#39;Orso 20:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

City-ship (+3)

 * Nominating and for. I'm surprised this article hasn't been featured yet. —Swedish Guy 15:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * For. A good article with lots of images and whatnot.&mdash;Anubis 10545 04:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * For. Lots of good info, lots of good pictures, good article. -- Matthew R Dunn 23:11, 18 October 2008 (UTC)