User talk:Anubis 10545

Welcome to Stargate Wiki! I've noticed that you've already made some contributions to our database -- thank you! We all hope that you'll enjoy our activities here and decide to join our community.

If you'd like to learn more about working with the nuts and bolts of this wiki, I have a few links that you might want to check out:


 * How to edit a page includes a basic tutorial about how to use our special wikitext code here on Stargate Wiki.
 * Contribute page provides some tips on how to expand our common database.
 * Projects is a place to start if you want to focus on a specific theme, for example season 9 episodes of Stargate SG-1, or something else.
 * Article templates for some pages that might help you in producing a great looking article.

One other suggestion: If you're going to make comments on talk pages or make other sorts of comments, please be sure to sign them with four tildes (~) to paste in your user name and the date/time of the comment.

If you have any questions, please feel free to post them in our Community Portal. Thanks, and once again, welcome to Stargate Wiki! -- SFH 05:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Administrator
Just out of curiosity, what does it take to be an Administrator / Featured user?
 * Well, mainly you need common sense and a lot of wikia know-how... Meaning you know what actions to take when a problem arises, and have a firm grasp on wiki markup. A high edit count also helps as the higher it is, the more experienced and knowledgeable you'll be.&mdash;Anubis 10545 00:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Uber-Beams
Thanks for the comment on the quote. I thought it was kind of cathcy...User:Phoenix304

In-universe vs out-of-universe
Please write in-universe articles from an in-universe perspective. We are not Wikipedia, and so we write about things from the Stargate universe as if they really exist. See SGCommand:Manual of Style. - Sikon 04:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Your dreams
Those are some pretty cool dreams, wish my ones were like them.

Dreams
Thank you. You have some pretty cool dreams yourself. Keep 'em comin.—Matthew R Dunn 11:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

That latest dream you posted sounded fun (as were many of your others). Sorry if I don't compliment you enough on those dreams, but I just thought I'd let you know that I read all your latest posts with great interest and intrigue. Keep that subconscious of yours conjure up more of those dreams. :) Matthew R Dunn 17:38, 26 July 2008

Thanks! You do the same.&mdash;Anubis 10545 17:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey man you have some great dreams with me favorite being the one where you were sheppard shooting at those ori dudes. i enjoy reding matthew r dunn dreams too you should make a page on them also. i do however hav a question who came up with the dream posting idea first you or matt? thanks
 * Thanks, and I am in the process of formulating a dream page like Matthew's, I just want to find something I can put on my userpage to replace the empty space so I can keep the images there without it looking weird. He posted his dreams first, I just liked the idea and used it.&mdash;Anubis 10545 14:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

305 Battleship
Hey its me Railgun88, I was reading your User Page when something caught my eye. I second your idea of having a far larger 305 battleship. Do you know if they are going to put it into the actually series'?-User:Railgun88
 * Unfortunately, they probably won't and I have heard nothing official regarding it. Although that would be cool. Especially if it was the size of the ship from Grace or an O'Neill-class ship. It's crazy, the Tau'ri have the most powerful ships, but they're the smallest ones in several galaxies. The introduction of one would be a good way to end the series though.&mdash;Anubis 10545 17:02, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

-they should make a mothership now. they have made tons of battle cruisers. just imagine, a tauri mothership with asgard tech. they should put the same type of weapon on it like the ori motherships have. but instead, theirs shoot asgard plasma beam instead of energy. it would take out hives in one shot. —SupremeCommander 20:30, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yea. Although it takes 9 months to construct a 304. To make a ship the size of an Asgard or Ori ship (which is several times a 304's size) it would take a few years. At their current rate of ship production, that would just be impractical. Especially because 304s are such a formidable craft already. I'm not saying it wouldn't be cool though, because it would be awesome! I mean, 304s are so small already, in The Pegasus Project when the Wraith ship was firing at Odyssey, a shot of the Hive's weapons practically hit the entire backside of the Odyssey. Although it does give me some comfort that Traveler ships are smaller than 304s (shown in The Lost Tribe).&mdash;Anubis 10545 20:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Constructing a mothership would be a pain, but they could always just take one from somebody and modify it with Asgard tech. I mean, there are millions of Ha'taks sitting around, waiting to be blown up in one shot, why not take one and upgrade it Prometheous style? But having a mothership presents another problem: manning it. Motherships are capable of carrying thousands of people, if we start building them, the Stargate program won't be secret because everybody and their brother will be in on it. Further more, we don't really need motherships as they are more for invading and what-not while our goal is exploration and defense. A larger battleship would be nice though. --Undomesticatedequine69 (talk) (Contribs) 16:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yea, except that the people we steal from are going to get majorly angry and invade us with a massive fleet of Ha'taks. (not to mention that we actually have steal the ship ourselves... which might be bloody... and difficult). But the people who make the show try to compensate for the size difference... EX: When a Hive Ship fires on another Hive, their weapon pulses are massive, but when they fire on a 304, they're much smaller. —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 16:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I didn't say steal, I said take. There is prolly a lame Goa'uld out there, trying to be evil that we can kill. I mean, we got a Ha'tak from Cronus once... And it probably wouldn't be bloody for us, after all, Ha'taks are just about the easiest things to infiltrate, maybe Hive ships are a little easier, but we could always buy one if worst comes to worst. And as far as being invaded by Ha'taks, they have tried that before.--Undomesticatedequine69 (talk) (Contribs) 01:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Screenshots
I had a question: what program do you use to take screenshots with? Great work by the way.--DrWho42 19:24, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't use a program to take screenshots with. I get them from various websites (including gateworld.net), crop them, and upload them here. Or if I can't find the screenshot I want, I download the episode, and press print screen. And what are you referring to when you say "great work".&mdash;Anubis 10545 22:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, I use the Print Screen key too. I was just referring to the ultra-impressive images along your user page.--DrWho42 23:21, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ultra-impressive images, I'm honored :) &mdash;Anubis 10545 00:46, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity
Anubis, I notice for some time now that, from my point of view, on your user page, by the time you finished with the text, the image where the Apollo gets hit by the beam to the one where Teal'c drinks coffee, it is absolute blank on the left side (if you know what I'm talking about) Now it's probably because I use a different system or something like that, but is this happening to you too, or is everything normal from your view point? I'm just curious. -- Matthew R Dunn 14:51, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, that's probably because my computer screen is smaller than yours is. On my screen, the External Links section meets up just about perfectly with the image of Teal'c drinking coffee. Although it's nice of you to bring something like that up if there was a major problem or something like that.&mdash;Anubis 10545 22:32, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

User Page
I think you had a very well done page. I really enjoyed reading and looking at all the pics. I hope you continue your page and add more to it. Could you look at my page. JKH3942. Thankyou
 * Thanks and I'm glad you liked/enjoyed it. Your page is good as well, although you might want to scale down your images.&mdash;Anubis 10545 23:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

question
How do I scale down my images????


 * Well, if you wanted to scale down this image for example, you would write Atlantis Stargate.JPG . You limit the size of the image by determining the number in front of the px.&mdash;Anubis 10545 06:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Contents
How do I make a contents??
 * Well, the box automatically appears on it's own but, you need to make at least 2 or 3 headings before it will appear. Headings being: ==Heading title here==

Thankyou
Thank you for helping me set up my page. I really appreciate it.
 * No problem, glad to help.&mdash;Anubis 10545 20:38, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

My User Page
I fixed my user page. Can you look at it now? Thankyou for all your help.
 * It looks amazing. You chose some really good images and your whole page is arranged in a nice fashion.&mdash;Anubis 10545 00:15, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

music
Could you please tell me is there a way for me to play a music file, e.g. from itunes into my page? And if so, how. Thanks
 * To the best of my knowledge, I don't think that's possible. Sorry.&mdash;Anubis 10545 00:22, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

My user page
Can you anwser my conterversial question at the bottom of my user page? Thank you.
 * Sure. You know I was going to earlier, but then I got caught up in something else, so I will do it right now.&mdash;Anubis 10545 05:39, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Help
Please ban 24.45.199.109, as he keeps removing information for the Asgard article. I warned him or her not to do it again, but he/she didn't listen, so please do something about it. -- Matthew R Dunn 23:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Could you please ask everyone to put an anwser on the contervisial question?

Thank you.

Editing
Do you know how to block people from editing your page?&mdash;Jeremy H
 * Well, if you mean "Protect" a page from being edited, only people with administrative rights (such as myself) can do that. Although that's mainly only for extensive vandalism.&mdash;Anubis 10545 04:36, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Phoenix Pics
Hey, thanks for the pix. Those are awsome. And thanks for the message too. I would have taken me a while to notice them on my own.:-)User:Phoenix304 10-8-08
 * Your welcome and I'm glad to help.&mdash;Anubis 10545 23:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

about JKH3942
He keeps messing about with the Nevada page, I have already warned him, and he won't listen. Please do something. -- Matthew R Dunn 17:40, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

My userpage
I switched my Username from JKH3942 to StargateFan so I will now be using my new account instead of my old JKH3942 account.

Sidebar edit
I was going through Characters -> Humans in the sidebar and I noticed it says Category:Balarans. I can't edit this myself, so I thought I'd leave a message here. Cheers. -Ka&#39;lel 02:09, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, I'll fix that. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.&mdash;Anubis 10545 02:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Just randomly noticed another very (very) minor error. SG-1 -> Season 10, episode four is called "Insiders" ... with an "s"....I did say very minor... —Ka&#39;lel 23:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Common.css
Hi

Can you add the code from MediaWiki_talk:Common.css to MediaWiki:Common.css


 * I've tested the code on The Bill Wiki so i know it works


 * Thanks -- Chief 15:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Richard Woolsey
Is Richard Woolsey a civilain or military?
 * Civilian.&mdash;Anubis 10545 05:13, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Images
So whats the rule on uploading screencaps? —AscendedAlteran 06:53, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Despite what the upload warning might say, you can upload screencaps from wherever the heck you feel like.&mdash;Anubis 10545 07:38, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I just changed it so it's less confusing and more accurate.&mdash;Anubis 10545 07:48, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Prometheus
Hi! I'm new so this is my first time. I just read your homepage and I noticed that it said that you were glad when the Prometheus was destroyed. If I may ask, why were you glad when the Prometheus was destroyed? Tau'ri 21300—Tau&#39;ri 21300 08:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Prometheus was a really ugly looking, small, and primitive ship (in comparison to Daedalus-class ships). The only weapons they ever fired from it were missiles... no railguns at all when that's really all the Daedalus uses during every engagement. That craft couldn't even defend itself from Al'kesh and Death Gliders in Prometheus Unbound... (it would have been destroyed if it wasn't for the Al'kesh Gen. Hammond and the rest of the Prometheus' crew commandeered), so how was it Earth's Flagship before the Odyssey. In Stargate SG-1, they kept using it when they had MUCH more powerful technology at their disposal. And for other reasons similar to that, I'm glad they destroyed Prometheus... they will never use that primitive ship ever again... (except for a small part in an alternate reality in The Road Not Taken... but that doesn't really count). Although I will confess that I was disappointed when I first saw the episode Ethon, when such a primitive race as the Keladonians destroyed a Tau'ri build ship... But I would never get over it if they destroyed the Daedalus. :) Oh, and welcome to SG Wiki.&mdash;Anubis 10545 02:04, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Do not forget there will be NO Deadalus NOR Oddysey... SRSLY Also, Atlantis would never be found without Prometheus defending SG-1 at Antarctica... So... Strč se... (native CZ speaker) Huge X-301 and X-303/BC-303 fan, guest Porupka Martin (migth register as matesds later...)
 * True, Prometheus did play an instrumental role in the series. I guess I can take comfort in knowing that without it, there would be no 304s :) .&mdash;Anubis 10545 18:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I did it!
I did what you suspected but said not to do!

check it out Air
 * Um...&mdash;Anubis 10545 23:29, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Movie trailer
Do you know if its possible to add movie trailers to the movie articles?—Tau&#39;ri 21300 00:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Well I know it's possible to upload video and play video directly on articles. The video would be in a box, much the same as an image, and you press play. They do this on Halopedia like in the article here, although I'm sure there's some sort of copywrite thing though... maybe. I'll look into it. It would also be nice to include video of battles too.&mdash;Anubis 10545 00:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * So its it might be possible—Tau&#39;ri 21300 01:00, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * ... yes, I'm pretty sure. It would involve changing around some MediaWiki stuff though. I'll see if I can set something up tomorrow.&mdash;Anubis 10545 01:03, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * thats good because i found a full video from youtube of the battle of asuras and a movie trailer of Stargate Continuum.—Tau&#39;ri 21300 01:09, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, adding an "Add a video" icon like there's an "Upload image" icon would require an extension to be added to this wiki... I think. For now, you can use this code: ZLCVIAkwQKU. That will produce a video box like this: CCz1kmfqL7g For more instructions on how to use this, go here.&mdash;Anubis 10545 01:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Is there a time limit for the videos because the video i has says that it isnt available or something. Can you help. ZLCVIAkwQKU —Tau&#39;ri 21300 03:46, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The video you tried to link there has been removed from Youtube. This is usually due to copyright infringement of some kind. —Ka&#39;lel 03:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

As for the removal of the video, what Ka'lel said sounds likely, but I'll see what I can do... probably tomorrow.&mdash;Anubis 10545 04:04, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

I replaced the not working video with a new one of the same battle. This should work... maybe.&mdash;Anubis 10545 04:28, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

The Video is actually still there!Look here ->—Tau&#39;ri 21300 05:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I know. I found out what was wrong. If it says on the video's page on Youtube, in the box next to the video "Embedding disabled by request", the video you put here won't work. If it doesn't say that, it's fine... At least I think that's what it is. But either way, the video will still remain on Youtube.&mdash;Anubis 10545 06:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I just put a video on the Battle of Asuras article... it's nice.&mdash;Anubis 10545 07:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Battle of P3Y-229
Hey Anubis10545, In the Battle of P3Y-229 article, can you try and edit it so that there won't be a big space between the quote of The Battle section and the first sentence. I tried to do it myself but i cant do it.—Tau&#39;ri 21300 06:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * On my screen, it looks perfectly normal.&mdash;Anubis 10545 06:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The reason it was doing that is because the image automatically positions itself below the infobox, taking the paragraph with it because it's linked in the code above the paragraph. To fix it I just aligned it to the left instead of the right, but if you're deadset on keeping it on the right, the image link has to be moved somewhere else in the source code and it won't line up with the paragraph.  At the same time, I resized the youtube thumb to the same size as the images. Cheers. —Ka&#39;lel 06:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, ok. I really don't care where the image goes. I guess because my computer screen is so small compared to everyone else's (apparently) changing the image's location didn't affect the text... or anything else.&mdash;Anubis 10545 06:55, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That reminded me of how it says "Mind The Gap" in subways in England... the way you fixed the gap in the article. For some reason i think that's funny. Although it might be sleep deprivation. That being said...&mdash;Anubis 10545 06:58, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

What resolution are you running? The standard now-a-days for non-widescreens is 1280x1024. As people increase their monitor sizes and the like, that's slowly changing though. That's where you run into problems with floating. The top of my User page (where those first images are) must look really messed up from your perspective. Given your hatred for large gaps in pages, I was surprised you like the way Korolev looks as it is, because on our screens, that's a massive gap. Cheers.—Ka&#39;lel 07:11, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * My resolution is 1024 by 768. On the Korolev page, the only gap from my perspective is between the External links heading and the 304-class ships template, if that's what your referring to. Matthew R Dunn mentioned that from his perspective, the images going down the right side of my userpage go way past where the text ends. However, from my perspective, the text and images line up just about perfectly.&mdash;Anubis 10545 07:19, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, and from your userpage, the 2 images you have of SG1 at the top that are side-to-side are about 2cm. from the contents box to the left.&mdash;Anubis 10545 07:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, the images on your userpage go waaaay past the text. I just decreased my resolution to 1024x768 and I still can't see what you're seeing, so I don't know what's going on there.  If it's feasible, I recommend increasing your res to match the majority.  Just to give you a heads up, this is what the rest of us see: Your user page and Korolev page. Note that these are photochopped and that I resized them to fit on your screen. The originals are much larger of course. Cheers. —Ka&#39;lel 08:03, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, I hadn't realized it was that bad. From my view of the korolev page, the 2 images are right next to each other directly under the text. I'll see what I can do.&mdash;Anubis 10545 00:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * By the way, I can't increase my resolution anymore. It's all the way up being at 1024 by 768. Every page must look completely different to everyone else, especially ones with images going down the sides of them.&mdash;Anubis 10545 00:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's very strange, because if I decrease my resolution to 1024x768, I should be able to see what you see, but I don't. It's strange...But anyways, if there's nothing you can do, there's nothing you can do. No worries. In the future, if I make an edit because it looks bad/wrong, I'll make a note in the summary that it might depend on the resolution of the monitor. But whatever I do, it should never flat-out break anything from your perspective.  For instance, the Korolev edit that I made. Though it may not look as good on your screen, it didn't actually mess anything up to the point where images were overlapping text or vice-versa, or the page was weird with big gaps, etc. So if I do something like the Korolev edit again (and I'll note it in the summary), just keep in mind that even though it looks a bit different in 1024x768, it looks a LOT better in 1280x1024.  Sorry, just reading over this paragraph, it's obvious I'm rambling. —Ka&#39;lel 19:11, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, over the past couple of years (or how ever long I've edited here) nothing has gone horribly wrong regarding the difference in resolution and monitor size. So, you don't really need to make a note of anything. I would like a bigger monitor, but even if I continue to use this one, everything will be fine (or at least not that bad).&mdash;Anubis 10545 19:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Redirecting
How do you redirect a page?—Tau&#39;ri 21300 00:43, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, if you want to move a page, on the tab at the top of a page where the "Edit this page" button is, there is a button that says "Move". Although to redirect an article (and not just move it, as some get that confused) you go to the page you want to redirect, clear all info from it, and type in #REDIRECT article name here .&mdash;Anubis 10545 00:50, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Nukes on Atlantis
Are there any nukes on Atlantis? If there is, why in the final episode, did they not send a nuke through when they dialed the hive ship?—98.165.212.18 03:21, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * There probably isn't, although they've never really said anything to prove or disprove it.&mdash;Anubis 10545 03:40, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Atlanteans Move
The Atlanteans disambig page should be moved over the Atlantean redirect page to match the wiki's production standard. This requires the Atlantean page first be deleted which is something only sysops or higher can do. Cheers. —Ka&#39;lel 17:05, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Taken care of.&mdash;Anubis 10545 18:36, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Rename
Hey, how do you rename an article?
 * There's a button at the top near the "Edit This Page" button that says "Move". Click on that, and it's pretty self explanatory from there.&mdash;Anubis 10545 05:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Error
Can you please fix this page. I found it earlier today and was unable to do it myself wiith confidence. Lucius Lavin. Thank you. SuperN 03:45, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, wow. That's seriously messed up. I'll see what I can do. it's probably a problem with the infobox.&mdash;Anubis 10545 03:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know how to do some thinsg with Wiki but everything i did with that only made it worse. Thanks, just trying to make this a better place for people. SuperN 03:53, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

There we go. There was some extra text next to where the image was in the infobox that made the page do that. And your welcome :) &mdash;Anubis 10545 03:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

why are u deleting my page nothing makes me mad than deleting my definition >:( Jonrio 16:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Your page included very little information, was not properly organized, and didn't mention Stargate. But other than that... &mdash;Anubis 10545 04:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Little help
Hi, can you delete File:Oldcityonm7g677.JPG for me please, since it is a duplicate of File:Oldcityonm7g677.jpg. Thanks. -- Matthew R Dunn 15:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Never mind, it seems SFH already took care of it. -- Matthew R Dunn 15:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello again, you may notice that I have categorised images by Atlantis episodes. While I was doing the searching to categorise them, I have noticed a few images that are either lo-res copies or seem unused. Those images are as follows;
 * File:Belkan.jpg
 * File:Lifeline 0252-1-.jpg
 * File:Spoils of War1.jpg
 * File:Asgard-LT.bmp
 * Those images need deleting, so if you can delete them for me, I would be greatful. Thanks. -- Matthew R Dunn 23:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Can you please help me?
I am new to this Wiki, so would appreciate some help. Could you please help me make some of my own userboxes because I am unsure as to how to make them. I would like to make ones with pictures already on this website in them, so any help would be appreciated.

Jonathan J. &#39;Jack&#39; O&#39;Neill 06:46, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

I was also wondering if it is alright if I borrow some of your userboxes to put them on my user page because I think that they are really awesome.

Jonathan J. &#39;Jack&#39; O&#39;Neill 06:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Feel free to use my userboxes. For creating your own, the easiest way to do it is to find one someone else created and "tweak" it... meaning change the text and the image to whatever you want instead (although you can change more than just that). Just toy around with it to get it to what you want. I have quite a few on my Wikipedia page if you want some ideas/templates. &mdash;Anubis 10545 02:33, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank-you for that. I am very grateful for your assistance.
 * &mdash;Jonathan J. &#39;Jack&#39; O&#39;Neill 07:35, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Delete Page
Could you please delete the page at: http://stargate.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:58.6.116.120#. I did not sign in and performed an edit by accident. I would like it to be taken down from this wiki. Thank-you in advance. Please send me a message when you get rid of it.
 * —Jonathan J. &#39;Jack&#39; O&#39;Neill 01:25, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, there's really no reason to. I mean, it's possible you could forget to sign in again and the message would automatically appear again. As it's doing no harm, we might as well just leave it. In the future when you want something to be deleted though, place this template:  on said article and the other admins and I will be able to take care of it.&mdash;Anubis 10545 17:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, I will do that in the future. Thank-you for the advice.
 * —Jonathan J. &#39;Jack&#39; O&#39;Neill 23:50, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Humans on Earth
Were there already humans on earth before the ancients settled it?
 * I'm not sure. But it's likely Humans evolved sometime after that...&mdash;Anubis 10545 23:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

sitenotice
Hi, I'm Scott from Wikia Entertainment. I wanted to let your community know about a giveaway on Terminator Wiki to win tickets to a screening of the new Terminator movie. If it's okay with you, I'd like to put a link in your sitenotice to help bring it some attention. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! 05:15, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, despite being part of the entertainment community, I'd really prefer to keep only Stargate-related information in the sitenotice.&mdash;Anubis 10545 05:40, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Hatak
Look if you dont like my hatak pages then write them your self i was just trying to help.
 * It is unnecessary to write articles with all of a whopping 2 sentences of information that are poorly written, formatted incorrectly, and are about things (in this case Ha'taks) that were really neither shown nor mentioned in the show or have a factor distinguishing it from respective articles. I would write them myself, but I really don't have the time to spend all day cleaning up other people's messes and writing articles that would be stubs at best. If you plan to create future articles, please do so to the best of your ability and make sure they meet this wiki's standards. If you need help with this, please refer to the following links: Manual of Style, Editing... thank you.&mdash;Anubis 10545 07:09, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Stargate movie
applying Sg1 canon to the movie renders whole scenes of the movie meaningless. THe whole seventh symbol thing in the movie shouldnt be there if we use sg1 canon with the DHD, ra's guards dont have jaffa pouches, and the ring transporters should have 5 rings taken out of them.Jsir 22:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

and by the way, the logical flaw thing i removed isnt a logical flaw, its just another one of the contradictions between the movie and the series, it belongs in the canon article listing the contradictions, not where it is now.Jsir 22:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * SG-1 is based on the movie. While there may be some differences, those differences belong on the cannon page, not anywhere else on this wiki except for maybe a "behind the scenes" section. Seeing as how the show is the most up-to-date source of info we have (opposed to the movie) we will go with the show for information.&mdash;Anubis 10545 22:20, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The show does not say that Anubis was Ra's first prime, someone just made that up, and it should be removed.Jsir 00:44, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It's a different Anubis than the half-ascended guy with the black suit.&mdash;Anubis 10545 00:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I know that, but his article acknowledges that he is human, and hes still not anyone's first prime. and he doesnt have any symbol on the forehead

and check out Point of Origin to see what i mean on the talk page.Jsir 01:09, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * We're going to include both the movie and series as cannon but (seeing how the show is more recent) use info from the show over the movie. About Jackson and the point of origin, that does contradict the series... at least the part on Abydos. So, just take out the last sentence of the paragraph then. About Anubis, just because he isn't a jaffa and doesn't have a mark on his forehead doesn't not make him a first prime. And even if you don't want to use the term "first prime", he served Ra in the same manner.&mdash;Anubis 10545 01:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Image categories
Hey, just wanted to say nice work on categorising those spaceship images, they look great. At least I know I'm not alone when categorising them as well. -- Matthew R Dunn 16:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks... I've been meaning to do it for a while now. Nice work categorizing images by episode... it actually made it easier for me to categorize the ship images :) &mdash;Anubis 10545 16:55, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * That's a good idea, I start forwards from the beginning, you start backwards from the end. Wonder which episode we'll meet? :) -- Matthew R Dunn 16:56, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, can you delete Category:Images from 2010 (episode)? -- Matthew R Dunn 19:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello:
Hi Anubis! My name is Karim. I'm on Wikia's Entertainment team. I just wanted to stop by, say hi, and let you know how awesome I think this wiki is. Its amazing!!! I've been a fan of Stargate since the original movie, but stopped watching in the middle stages of SG-1. Its interesting that you think the later seasons in SG-1 are the best. With Stargate Universe coming up, i've got to catch up BIG TIME! Starting with Season 7 :) Anyways, just wanted to stop by and say hello. Feel free to hit me up for any reason and let me know if you ever have any questions or need help with any content building projects. Thanks! -- Karim (talk ) 23:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Timeline
Hello, no problem. im still getting my head around the code and creatin new pages, so iv done a few things i didnt wanna do. or thought i had to do somethin, in order to do somethin else. reason i created a few pages with "No timeline data available at this time" anyway, i think iv got my head around things now (i think)

Also, i use to be the user called jeffrey123450, but uni took over my life so i had to stop work on the stargate timeline originally. Anyway, iv got my life back now, so i wanna get the timeline sorted. iv created the new user name Stargate TL1 (Stagate Timeliner 1).

anythin else i screw up or needs fixin let me know. as i say, im still getting my head around things on here.

--Stargate TL1 22:33, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Wormhole X-Treme
also, someone has written on the timeline previously....

* 2016 - After a run of ten years, Wormhole X-Treme! completes it's two hundredth episode.

do you know if the is this date is right? as i thought Wormhole X-Treme had a series run, before being cancelled in the 100th episode of SG1, and then returned in the 200th episode? so would this bring the final episode of Wormhole X-Treme forward to 2015. i hope that makes sense.

--Stargate TL1 22:50, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm really not sure. I do think, though, that it would be 2016 becaus the show was canceled only after a few episodes (not really a whole season). It would be best to leave it out as there's really no way to be 100% sure. &mdash;Anubis 10545 04:32, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


 * That's what i thought. thanks for your opinion. --Stargate TL1 23:50, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Wormhole X-treme was canceled after three episodes --Undomesticatedequine69 23:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Stargate timeline
i need your opinion. In the Stargate timeline pages we have event data (including source), but at the bottom of the page someone has also added "episode broadcastered" that year. He is a link to one of the pages....

http://stargate.wikia.com/wiki/1998

In my personal opinion, the timeline pages should be a record of events, as if they had really happened only and production data should be stored in a different section. Also, even if an episode aired in 2001 (for example), the data from the show might appear in several years throughout the timeline (e.g, 1968, 1996 and 2001. Perhaps we could have a seperate production database, which contains broadcasted episodes, movie, novels, comics and audio stories ect ect. wot ye think?

anyway, wot do you think of the tables in each timeline year? i think it makes it easier to read and access information. im gonna start workin on filling in the missing timeline data next, so the timeline becomes more realiable, detailed and complete.

--Stargate TL1 23:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I do like the tables. About the broadcasted episodes section, I think it would be better to include it (like how it is in the 1998 article) because it is somewhat separated from the rest of the page, and it helps organize things (kind of). Having an entirely separate database "thing" for the production info seems unnecessary. I know our point or view is to perceive things as though they really happened, but just think of it like how we have "behind the scenes" sections. And lets also include the "First Contacts" and "Planets Visited" sections like we previously did... although I suppose that too could be included in the tables... doesn't really matter though.


 * Also, when you reference an episode which shares the same name with an article here... (like Cor-ai (episode) and Cor-ai) ... to reference the episode, write it like this: Cor-ai . If you use the template (which looks like this): , you write it like this:  . That might sound confusing, so feel free to ask again for more assistance with that... or anything else...&mdash;Anubis 10545 01:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Stargate timeline
thats sounds fair enough. i deleted the "First Contacts" and "Planets Visited" sections by accident. i added alot there originally, when i had the user name jeffrey123450. i think i accidently deleted them when i was moving things into the table, or doing somethin with the table. im just like a bull in a china shop when im movin and addin things at the moment, so if i mess anything else up, let me know and ill fix it. no-one else should have fix my screw ups.

template
when using the template, can you do it without having brackets around the cite? cuz when im usin this template, im getting brackets.... but when other users have used it, they dont seem to get brackets. is it because im using this cite refrence in a table?
 * Your supposed to get brackets. Don't use that template in the tables... I was just letting you know in case you didn't. Keep doing what you were before. &mdash;Anubis 10545 21:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

thank you for your help

--Stargate TL1 21:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

timeline structual improvement
After talkin about including the Broadcastered episodes, races and planets in the individual timelines, i decided to improve how the information is presented on the page. Could you let me know what you think and any suggestions would be welcome...

http://stargate.wikia.com/wiki/1997   ..... (you'll have to scoll down past the first table)

--Stargate TL1 19:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks nice :). By the way, when you provide a link on this site, you can just put 1997 instead of the web adress.&mdash;Anubis 10545 19:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

i should have thought of that, lol. thanks again --Stargate TL1 19:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

stargate timeline rules
i was thinking about how we should possible organise and log facts in the stargate timeline, as most events can only be educationally estimated (at best), and i came to the conclusion that we need some rules. Because there are two methods to recored events...

1) that when a season of stargate first aired (e.g, 2003) is when all the events in the timeline should be logged. However, the problem with this method, is that a season of stargate generally crosses over 2 seperate years (2003 and 2004). or

2) that the events in the timeline are estimated depending on when an episode aired. (for example, if an episode first aired on the 9th of september 2007, then the events are recorded in the 2007 timeline section, unless suggested or stated otherwise) However, if an episode is more than one part, and the first and second part aired in two seperate years (e.g, part 1 in december 2005, and part 2 in Febuary 2006), then the events in part 2 happened in the same year as part 1, unless suggested or stated otherwise.

in my opinion, i belive we should go with option 2. i know the events in the timeline are probably never gonna be perfact, and open to much discussion (like the timeline that was on wikipedia). But i believe its important that events are recorded and organised in one way (everyone singing from the same hymnsheet) otherwise the timeline is never gonna work. Also i dont want my hardwork over the next few months to be pointless.

wot do you think? i ask you because your on top of the featured users list.--Stargate TL1 21:39, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Option 2. When a 2-part episode happens in different years... well that's a headache :). I would include the 2nd part in the same year as the 1st part though.&mdash;Anubis 10545 22:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

A-Z
i was thinkin about creatin a A-Z of stargate? this would include a pic, a brief description, and a link to the page about the item in more detail (if the user wants to find out more). i just think it would be a good way of bringing everythin together in an A-Z format. im not gonna tell you the advantages, as that would be insulting your intelligence, lol. plus i need a break from doin the timeline occasionally, so this would be a nice side project to work on. wot do youn think? --Stargate TL1 13:35, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, it is a noble idea (and I can see the advantages), but frankly seems unnecessary. It wouldn't really add that much to this site (as if anyone wanted to know about something, they could just type it into the search bar... or press "Random page") Plus, we have over 4300 articles... it would be a massive undertaking. If you want to take a break with doing the timeline, feel free to work on the other articles we have here in need of assistance... :) &mdash;Anubis 10545 17:38, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

i agree, its a massive undertaken. i just wanna make the wiki user friendly to new and mild users. But its not a critism, cuz i know alot of people have investered thier time and effort into makin this a very good wiki.

wot things do you need assisstance with on stargate wiki? im gonna start rightin detailed plots for the novels and comics soonish (like you do on the episodes) but im not ready to start that yet.

anyway, iv been buildin a schools website over the last few months. Different to the wiki format, but still alot of fun. if ye wanna have a nose, he's da web link... http://liverpool.schooljotter.com/kensingtoninfants

thanks for your honest views --Stargate TL1 18:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Stargate: Children of the Gods (Final Cut)
is the final cut of 'Stargate: children of the Gods' gonna be included as a normal part of the stargate universe or an alternative reality/verson? cuz the new verson is gonna have addition, removed and/or alternative scenes. just so i know what im doin, when i include anythin from this final cut into the Stargate timeline.

--Stargate TL1 18:37, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh... I've been thinking about what to do with that. Seeing how the Final Cut is more recent and therefore more cannon, we should more lean towards looking to that for info. Although this can be confusing (By that I mean ((for example)) we could include, in the appropriate articles, that Apophis used a Tel'tak to transport himself, Amaunet, and Klorel). But, we could keep the Transport Glider article, have the same info, but make reference to Apophis using different crafts in the final and original cuts in "behind the scenes" sections.
 * As for having a different article that describes the final cut (like an episode description)... I'm leaning towards not doing that. However, we can have an article (which can be placed in the Stargate DVDs article) that (as well as including things like bonus features, etc.) can also include the changes from the original cut. &mdash;Anubis 10545 19:53, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

ye, i think that's best --Stargate TL1 20:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

p.s; wot do you need a hand with on wiki? ye said b4, there wz a few things dat needed doin.
 * I don't need help with something specific that I'm doing, but... check out Category:SGCommand maintenance or Wanted pages. Those links link to a number of articles that could use improvement. &mdash;Anubis 10545 21:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Most of the articles listed on Wanted pages have the suffix "(episode)" is this due to mis-linking from Other pages? I'll do some more digging and if that turns our to be the case, is it possible to just redirect them to their actual articles or should it be the reverse, should the pages that are not listed with "(episode)" (which are episode articles) be moved & redirected to the pages that do have "(episode)" as the suffix?--Jenkins08 (talk) (Contribs) 15:03, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No, that's just a bug with new cite version. Engine belives that this link exist, but it doesn't --╔▲╠☼╚╡∩║▀⌠⅜⌡├┤∩ (talk) (Contribs) 15:23, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for more images
Sorry did not know they had such images already on the pages. &mdash;Pellor 21:59, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

timeline
Hello, the timline is startin to come along now, but i was wonderin ifye could have a look and make any suggetions? for example the stucture ect ect. here is a typical example of the timeline page that is half complete.... 1999

--Stargate TL1 20:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks fine :) —Anubis 10545 23:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

thankyou :) just need to get the facts in there now

Images question
I noticed that you contribute a lot of HD screenshots as images, I was just wondering where you get the pics from? Fa6ade 16:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Usually from Gateworld, but below are the links I also get them from:

—Anubis 10545 16:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * http://www.gateworld.net/gallery/index.php
 * http://www.macsyourman.com/atlantis/screencaps/season5caps.html
 * http://www.atlantisarchive.com/gallery/
 * http://www.stargatecaps.com/

moving left to right
hello, how come you moved "width="1015" code in tables? just so i know wot im doin wrong?
 * It did that automatically when I edited the page.—Anubis 10545 21:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

dats odd :S but thanks again for addin the catagories --Stargate TL1 21:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

SGU Sidebar Edits
Hey! A few things. Time and Life need to be switched around and Human links to Humans not the episode. However, yesterday's JoBlog would suggest that Cooper's attempt at renaming it Human didn't go over very well and it's name remained (or was changed back) to Lucid. Not really sure what to do with that. Thanks in advance! Cheers. —Ka&#39;lel 20:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Further edits: Time and Life have to be switched back =\ . I believe we may have Lost and Sabotage out of order as well, but this is unconfirmed. Cheers. - 04:44, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure I understand.
Exactly how did Stargate make you an atheist? I'm just curious...
 * It didn't do it single handedly... but it played a large role... Especially with episodes like Demons where the world is controlled by religious "wackjobs" who don't listen to reason and are "blinded" by "faith". Then, the whole Goa'uld arc and then Ori arc were really Anti-"god" centered. Also, Ascension is just a regular part of evolution that can happen naturally, mostly occurring to already somewhat highly evolved creatures. Being "good" only plays a role if someone helps you ascend, in which case you aren't evolved enough to do it yourself naturally. It also got me watching History Channel more and shows about the universe... realizing how the idea of a "god" sounds... ridiculous... no offense. But, I've never really been religious...—Anubis 10545 00:59, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

No offense taken, I'm certainly not the religious type myself. I went to a Catholic school and thought it was malarkey the whole time. I am not an atheist though, I'd say I'm agnostic. I don't really like that term though because it makes you sound like a gross person. So I guess I wouldn't say that actually... I just have a hard time believing that any religion marred by man can possibly be correct. It is a quite perplexing thing, the universe. They say it essentially came from nothing, and the answer to that is "Our god made it!". But where did said god come from? But maybe I'll find that out later, more importantly, Stargate! I don't have cable, so I rarely got to see any episodes, but they are posting them on Hulu now. I'm pretty stoked about that. Hopefully they put Universe up there too! What I wonder though, is where people who don't ascend go in Stargate. I want to know what happened to poor old Thor! --Undomesticatedequine69 02:49, 2 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I was actually thinking about how I'm going to be able to watch Universe as well. I live in Canada, so not only is the Space Channel only now airing season 4 of SGA and calling them new episodes, but Hulu isn't available anywhere but the States.  I actually downloaded HD episodes of SGA Season 5 as they aired so I could watch it as live as possible. I really only own all the SGA episodes only in digital format, though that makes it easier to edit and upload some awesome pics. I'll probably have to do the same with Universe, because I don't think the Space Channel will be airing them in tandem with Syfy. About the god discussion, given Thor's intelligence and general Asgard apathy he probably didn't fear death, but they never really discussed Asgard afterlife beliefs.  I'd call myself an agnostic, but I don't think about it often. I do think organized religion is bullshit though, some much more than others, but I won't point out which. —Ka&#39;lel 06:30, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Signature
Please look at the optional updated code on MediaWiki talk:Signature for MediaWiki:Signature

Thanks


 * -- Chief 03:08, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello
Hi, I'm Shawn, from Wikia Entertainment. I've been taking a look around the wiki and I really like what the community has accomplished so far. This wiki has a lot of potential, too and I want to lend a hand by doing a bit of work to the main page that will help out with navigation and make the wiki a bit more accessible for new users. I'll be playing around with some stuff in a sandbox page and will let all the admins here check it out when I'm done, and you can give me feedback on it. I'm leaving this message with all the other admins so everyone will know what's going on as it happens. Thanks! Shawn ( talk ) 03:57, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, I wanted to leave an update with you and the other admins, I've finished a mockup of a new main page layout that features an image-based portal in greater prominence. Please take a look at it here and let me know what you think! I'd like to hear your feedback. Thanks! Shawn ( talk ) 17:08, 25 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your feedback, Anubis. I took your suggestions, went back in and added a small Help section and an About Stargate section to replace the top-of-page Welcome, you can see the changes I made here. I made the Help section smaller because our research on Wikia Entertainment wikis shows that people rarely ever click on Help links, preferring to ask others or learn by doing. It may be worth it to have a smaller section for the rare person who might use it, but it shouldn't take up too much main page real estate to be effective (since nobody uses it). Similarly, addressing your concerns about the image portal I introduced to the top of the page, we've found that very few people click on the sidebar menu, and that it's always worth having an eyecatching image portal on the main page. People respond to interesting images more than blocks of text, we've found it does wonders for both helping acclimate new users as well as getting more people to explore and edit.


 * I also added an "About Stargate" section to the bottom of the page, partially because it helps a lot with Google indexing, meaning more people will find your wiki via Google searches, and also because there isn't a simple overall explanation of the franchise that's easily accessible on the wiki. Please take a look at the changes I made, and let me know what you think. Everything I've done is with an eye geared toward optimizing the main-page experience for both new users and the regulars here, based on extensive research Wikia Entertainment has done on other wikis. It would be great to make the changes to help promote the new Universe show, and I'd like to get it set up as soon as possible. Shawn ( talk ) 17:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Anubis - thanks so much for taking such an active and friendly role in working on this. It's very appreciated! I think it's great that you're open to making changes for the better. I took your concerns about wanting the welcome to stay on the main page to heart, and did another redesign myself. I shifted it to the right hand column, where I think it fits nicely without being obtrusive. I'd like to take this opportunity to explain some of the design choices I made a little further.


 * There's a term we use in the Entertainment Team called "above the fold", and it refers to all content that appears near the top of a user's screen that they don't have to scroll down to see. This is an important concept, because most users who visit a wiki looking for information rarely ever scroll down below the fold - that is, past what they initially see when a main page loads. This is why it's important to make the content that is the most useful to your users be as clearly displayed as possible.


 * Take a look at the welcome as it is now - there's three links there, two of which direct new users to the inner workings of a wiki, and one that acts as a spoiler warning. Most people coming to look at your wiki - especially the new fans who will be coming that are interested in SG Universe information - probably won't be too concerned about making edits or looking at site statistics right away. They're going to want a quick, obvious way to find and read content, which is what the image portal will be good for. And your established editors don't need that info up top either, because they know where to find it if they do need it. Leaving the spoiler warning in place probably isn't a bad idea for new readers, but keeping the other stuff at the top is really just keeping new users from getting at Stargate information quickly. Making this information easy to access is what gets new users to enjoy coming to the wiki, and in turn makes them want to become active editors, fulfilling the purpose of the welcome message!


 * Another term we use is SEO, and it stands for Search Engine Optimization. This applies to all search engines, but I'll use Google as an example - when Google looks at a Wikia wiki, what it sees as most important is what's in the upper left hand column of the screen - where we want the image portal and links to be, and where you have the welcome. We want there to be a lot of great content links there so your wiki gets recognized by Google accordingly, and appears higher in searches. Conversely, the least important stuff Google looks at is in the lower right hand column - where there's currently a content portal, and what turning it to a front-and-center image portal aims to fix. Think of it this way: your wiki has a certain amount of Google juice it can use. Right now, that juice is being used up on something that won't be ranked well. By switching the welcome to the right, and keeping relevant information like categories and upcoming Stargate media events up above the fold and visible, you're pumping all that Google juice into things that will really matter. There's other SEO tricks I used in my design, like having a brief paragraph on Stargate on the main page, that will help as well.


 * Hopefully that explains things a little better. We've been collecting a lot of data on all this stuff on wikis we've been working with on Gaming and Entertainment, like WoW Wiki, and Starcraft Wiki, that have showed us the most effective ways of getting wikis noticed. I have an idea: what if we take the main page design I made and have it active for a month. During that time, myself and the other Wikia Entertainment Team members will track the stats of the wiki. That way you and the other admins/editors can see how it works yourself. Does that sound fair? Shawn ( talk ) 07:10, September 2, 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for going into such great detail. Sure, that sounds fine. I'll go ahead and get the main page set up... and replace the links that the portals go to so they're not broken... and put the new content in the appropriate templates. Thanks!—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 23:07, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

Howdy
Hello there Anubis... I was just wondering what you think of my :)?

Great wiki btw, had a blast reading your user page your dreams are astounding! --Jenkins08 (talk) (Contribs) 09:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Your fan art's pretty cool, as is your userpage :) —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 17:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Cheers dude.. I'll be updating my userpage with more pretty pictures when i get a chance to either make them or take them lol :D --Jenkins08 (talk) (Contribs) 18:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

HELPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i really need your help with a problem. i have created a juggling wiki (http://jugglebox.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page) and i have editored the main navigation menu to suit my wiki, including the colour theme using Monaco (Brick). However, if you do a seach for a juggling wiki using the wikia search bar (when not logged in), then find and access my wiki, both the main navigation menu and colour theme i editored are NOT there. Instead the pre-set/original wiki main navigation menu and colour theme load on the Juggling wiki. the only way you can see the main navigtion menu and colour theme is to log-in into wikia. Most other Wiki's (i.e. Stargate Wikik) let users see the main navagation menu and colour theme. I just want users to be able to access the wiki (as iv designed it) without having to create an account or log-in.

i have used the 'MediaWiki:Monaco-sidebar' to design my main navigation menu and my prefferences (with admin options) to design page format.

any help would be appreciated, as iv been trying to fix this for nearly 4 hours, without any look.

thanks --Stargate TL1 (talk) (Contribs) 13:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Response—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 17:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Cache
You have logout and clear you cache, then search/load the juggle wiki. then the wiki does'nt load the main navigation menu or the wiki format i desiged. it reverts back to the pre-set/original format. once ye log in (and have cache from a log-in) the wiki will load properly. Im just trying to sort it out, so when people access wikia and look for juggling, they can use the juggling wiki properly or as i designed. im gonna leave it 24 hours, and see when the wikia system updates over night, if the problem is corrected. *fingers crossed.

thanks for looking again --Stargate TL1 (talk) (Contribs) 17:55, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

hey anubis, i hope you will get this message (im not that good around wiki so i cant do it myself) some actors on stargate wiki has on their info "Date of death: TBD". example: http://stargate.wikia.com/wiki/Kate_Hewlett

if you could double check it and change it, or even let me know where i can see all the actors list .. and how to remove the line without destroying the table.. let me know if i can help

SGU Images
If you don't mind, I'm going to upload HD versions of a lot of the images you're choosing. They're really good images. Cheers. —Ka&#39;lel (talk) (Contribs) 19:06, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm always in favor of good images :) —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 19:10, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

MPContent template
Thanks for changing the images in the 'gates'. I really wasn't a fan of the old ones but it wasn't my place to say anything. The new ones are great. Cheers. -Ka&#39;lel (talk) (Contribs) 06:16, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I really didn't like them either. I've been meaning to change them for a while, but I just found the time... and figured out a good way to do it :). If you have any suggestion regarding those in the future, let me know. I did want to incorporated something SGU related, but we really don't have the right image yet... most SGU images are... lacking a lot color it seems. —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 06:29, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

How did you like SGU?
Were you surprised and dismayed to see a measly three Ha'tak motherships do what they want when a 304 was there? I thought it was pretty good overall. I was upset that Lou Diamond Phillips was only in it for twenty seconds and I don't know about the rest of the cast. I wasn't too fond of the flashback thing either, I would have preferred to see it in chronological order, hopefully they don't put too many flashbacks in later episodes. RDA is pretty fat, and he has hearing loss, I kind of feel bad for him. Anywho, I know it is supposed to deal with survival for the most part, but I'm really hoping for a good deal of exploration, which Atlantis I thought lacked a bit. I'm also interested to see how these Kino videos work out. Who knows at this point, we could be seeing SG-1's Majora's Mask? What do you think?--Undomesticatedequine69 (talk) (Contribs) 15:44, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow, those are my thoughts exactly :) With the Ha'taks, I don't think it even showed George Hammond shooting, although Carter said they were able to cut the force of Gliders down a bit. Wasn't really a fan of the flashbacks, but otherwise the scenes where they were on the Destiny would have seemed boring and drawn out. So, I guess it was for the best. Although Syfy just ran it again about 10 minutes ago and the episode(s) seemed better the second time. Poor RDA... weird to think he's almost 60. New show... "Seniors in Space!!" :) —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 18:18, October 4, 2009 (UTC)


 * Watching shows like Lost and Defying Gravity I'm no stranger to flashbacks, so I had no problem with them. (I'm also a Tarantino fan). I also thought that the three Hataks did a huge amount of damage and here are my thoughts: Maybe the Hammond isn't finished and battle ready yet. It seems to be a shuttle between Earth and Icarus. The Hataks were obviously prepared for the fight, attacking as soon as they dropped from Hyperspace and deploying gliders, but for some reason they weren't aware of what they were attacking. As prepared as they seemed for the fight, they didn't anticipate the already unstable planet would explode? I hope we learn more about who they are, but the focus of the show is obviously on the Destiny, so it's unlikely. The sex scene was very out of place for me, like you said it set the mood for the show, but it was like hitting the audience with a blunt object and saying "this aint yo momma's Stargate". And though I love the character of Eli, I don't buy the genious part of it yet, but I think that'll change when we hear a bunch of techno-babble coming from him, which there was none of in the premiere. Other than that, I really liked the premiere. Rush reminds me of Gaius Baltar. Cheers. -Ka&#39;lel (talk) (Contribs) 19:53, October 4, 2009 (UTC)


 * Although apparently in the episode Incursion, there's something about a Lucian Alliance commander "Kiva"... so we might yet find out more about the attack. That's an interesting point about the Hammond not being fully battle ready... like the Odyssey was in Off the Grid, which wasn't able to put up with as much firepower. Also, what was up with that purple hyperspace window effect? It just seemed... weird. To me, the scene where Rush is in his room in Icarus Base crying after he sees that picture seems just as out of place... maybe more so to me, as the sex scene. He was all-out sobbing... it just seemed a little much. And, I mean, they were wearing clothes... mostly, in the sex scene. It really didn't seem that bad. And the scene really let you get a feel for Scott's personality.—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 20:53, October 4, 2009 (UTC)


 * I forgot about Rush's crying scene. I think the problem with that was that it was way too early and we haven't connected to the characters yet. We (the average viewer who doesn't hunt for spoilers) know absolutely nothing about Rush or his background, so we don't know what's going on and can't connect or feel for him in that scene and it just comes across as awkward. Don't get me wrong, I wasn't put off by the sex scene, I'm an adult (or like to think I am). It just seemed forced and tacked on. Cheers. -Ka&#39;lel (talk) (Contribs) 21:56, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

Kiva you say? I've secretly been hoping Netan made a daring escape, but that seems unlikely. I hadn't noticed the purple hyperspace window before, I guess they like changing colors around though. I am interested to see what it is they use for "FTL" on the Destiny. I'm thinking a Tachyon drive maybe. The sex scene wasn't a big deal for me either way, and Rush seems like a butthole to me. Eli seems likable, as does Colonel Young, but I just don't know about these other guys. I wonder if they will be getting a Teal'c/Ronin character in the series? Although, they said that the aliens are supposed to be a lot more "alien-looking". Oh well, the possibilities are endless, and it sure is exciting to watch the twists and turns in the plot.--Undomesticatedequine69 (talk) (Contribs) 22:29, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
 * To me, the only character I really didn't find likable was Ronald Greer. Although they really didn't go into depth about his character... or show him that much except for when he "blew up" in Rush's face. —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 22:43, October 4, 2009 (UTC)


 * I didn't like Greer either, but I don't think he's supposed to be likable. -Ka&#39;lel (talk) (Contribs) 23:00, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

Jack O'Neill's Wiki
since i saw the new pic of Jack in the 2009 area dont u think that should be the default pic?
 * Just because it's the most recent image of him doesn't mean that it's the best. The current one we have in the infobox is good quality and "describes" him more... seeing as how he's in full uniform...—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 22:53, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, plus he's fat now and I'd rather not think about poor old RDA that way. --Undomesticatedequine69 (talk) (Contribs) 23:03, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * Ha... That too. :) —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 23:05, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

Naming the planets of stargate Universe
Hi, since I know you are one of the Stargate fans that makes this Wikia improve the most, I figured out that I should leave you a message. Since their are no names for the SGU planets apart from "desert planet" "jungle planet" "ice planet", I have been thinking to a way to name them similarily to the PX**** thing and M***** thing in respectively SG1 and Altantis. So here is my thoughts : Every single star and planet will begin with U (for Universe) Then a S (for season) and the number of the season 1 for the 1st season, etc... Then a P (for PLanet) or a S (for Star)which will be followed by the number of the planet. So in Air, we have : US1P1 for the Desert PLanet, US1P2 for the planet where Palmer and Curtis went. and US1P3 and US1P4 and US1P5 for the three others that are said to be in range of the Destiny. In Darkness, we follow the same idea with US1P6 for the giant gas planet, and up to P9 with the three other planet of the star system. And we could possibly name the star in this solar system : US1S1

what do you think ? --86.72.60.184 16:38, October 17, 2009 (UTC)Anubis91
 * This idea doesn't make any sense.
 * Frankly, it seems like it would be easier, and would make more sense to new editors, if we didn't adopt this system. It is a good idea though and I'm glad that you thought of another way (we could always use new ideas). But, unless an official name is given, we will just continue to call new planets "Planet (episode)". The current system we use to name unnamed planets seems to work relatively well. —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 16:57, October 17, 2009 (UTC)


 * It doesn't make the title any less conjectural. Also, say it's season two and you're trying to remember a particular planet from season one, it will always be easier to remember that desert planet from Air than it will be to remember that US1P1 is the desert planet. Cheers. - 17:01, October 17, 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Ads on stargate wiki
I was visiting the page detailing trinium (http://stargate.wikia.com/wiki/Trinium) linked through from the Iris page, and an ad fullscreen popped up and prompted "your computer needs a virus scan" and when closing the window, prompted "To close the window, press okay. To stay, press cancel." After closing the window, my AVG anti-virus detected an attempted download of a trojan from the website.

I'd recommend checking out your ad-sources.

- Jamie jamie@odoshi.net
 * That's not good. That's happened to me a couple of times on other sites. There's not much I can do about advertisements (Central Wiki deals with that). If you want to avoid those advertisements, you can just create an account and most of them won't show up.—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 23:13, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * I would also suggest Adblock plus if you are using Firefox. - 00:31, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

Editing
Why do my edits keep getting undone.

My last one was the Destiny page, it was based on OBSERVATION of something seen on the show yet it is dismissed. there are a lot of assumptions on this wiki and they get away with that.

so whats the deal? is my opinion not valid enough for you
 * That's just it... it is a personal opinion and not a fact that Destiny has 15 decks. We have no idea what the dimensions of the ship even are. We will only include factual information on this wiki (that is information received from cannon sources, including the show itself). Fan-based assumptions have no place here and any non-cited and fan-based edit will be undone.—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 02:44, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for correcting my error, was a bit sleepy when I made the edit ^^ — Malmern (talk)

Destiny Gallery Edit
Because the page is locked indefinitely, could you please remove the following two images from the Destiny page? [[Media:Comiccon2009 observation.jpg|This one]] and [[Media:Normal comiccon trailer1 120.jpg|this one]] as they're O-Deck pictures. Thank you kindly. - 06:02, November 10, 2009 (UTC)

Earth adress from the Destiny
Hi, now that "Earth" has aired on SyFy, we have the 5 first symbols of the adress ! But in a video published on the MGM website a while ago, we can see a 9 symbols adress and the first 5 symbols are the same in the same order that those seen in the episode Earth here's the video : http://stargate.mgm.com/view/content/1500/index.html

So that could be the Earth adress ! the only problem is that none of the 7th 8th or 9th symbols are the Destiny's point of origin as shown in Air part 2 ... is it another adress code ? 86.72.60.184 14:09, November 11, 2009 (UTC)Anubis91
 * Well, the 4th and 5th symbols in the address are clearly different (most easily shown as those symbols having curved parts where as the symbols found on the episode don't). Plus, as you said, the point of origin is different too. So no, that's probably not Earth's address.—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 18:25, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * Wait a minute. On wikipedia here, the first 5 symbols are the same (which contradicts what we have here). Either way though, it's too inconclusive to say for sure, and so we won't included it until more definitive information is released.—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 18:32, November 11, 2009 (UTC)

Yesterday, while writing this message, I remembered seeing a pictures of the Atlantis DHD with a list of planets and their respective adresses on it. So I asked Joe Mallozzi on his blog if us fans could see some kind of lists for either Atlantis or Universe. And in his latest mailbag he answered : Anubis91 writes: “I would like to know if we could see those “un”official lists of adress that has been done in the past ?” Answer: I’ll look into it for you. So we'll have to wait and see what he will come up with !86.72.60.184 08:54, November 12, 2009 (UTC)Anubis91

And by the way, I've just rewatched Earth, during the dialing sequence, we can see clearly the 3 first symbols which are in order : 10,31,36, then we can't have a direct view over the 4th symbol but the position is the 18th of the Gate and finally we have a good picture of the 5th symbol which is the 2nd. So the dialing sequence is as we know it : 10,31,36,18,2. Now on the video published on the official site, the entire unknown 9 symbols sequence is : 10,31,36,18,2,3,28,7,30 So I think we can assume it's the Earth adress... 86.72.60.184 11:21, November 12, 2009 (UTC)Anubis91

304 edit
i edited some things on the 304 page and they were undone, if you can offer me ABSOLUTE proof that i was wrong i will let this go
 * The Absolute proof is shown on the show itself. As far as we know, naquadah generators are the main power source on 304s. About the bridge: while there are instances that indicate that the bridge may be in the super structure towards the rear, the neck of the Daedalus is indisputably shown to be directly in front of the bridge window in Allies... and to some extent in Air, Part 1. The instances where the neck is not shown out of the bridge window is likely due to the angle at which the scene was shot. Also, it is likely easier for the producers (or whoever does takes care of graphics) to simply leave the neck out of the out of the scene as to provide for a better view of battles and whatnot. As an administrator of this site, unless I see absolute proof to the contrary, we will include that the bridge is, in fact, on the neck and not in the superstructure. Any edits to the contrary will be reverted. The MGM tech journal entries are known to have errors (as are other published sources). As for the Ark of Truth, it easily could have just been a time delay that caused the scene of the bridge demolecuralizing to occur after the neck had passed through. Such a delay would likely have occured to lengthen the scene where Odyssey entered the supergate just for the sake of cool special effects. —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 01:47, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

Delete Months
could you please delete the months pages iv created (January to December). i was workin on somethin, but lookin back i dont think they have any real perpose. or more importantly my idea is'nt workable. below is a link to a page i would like deleting. from here should be able to find the other pages i would like deleting...

http://stargate.wikia.com/wiki/January

sorry about creatin work for you,

--Stargate TL1 (talk) (Contribs) 03:26, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

Kino Webispodes
are we gonna do page(s) for the Kino webisodes? i know the content would be short, but i think we could have them better than avin them listed in the 'Kino' section. any suggestions? iv also added da Kino webisodes to the 2009 timeline, under the heading "Stargate Universe Kino Webisodes."

--Stargate TL1 (talk) (Contribs) 19:32, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I suppose we will have articles for each individual Kino webisode. We could include a brief summary/description of the webisode, have a link.... maybe an image that shows the plot.... maybe a quote. We actually probably should use the episode infobox for them too. If you want to do that, feel free. They should be placed in the category: "Kino webisodes".—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 19:38, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

---ok, ill sort da articles out for each webisode, with da things you suggested. ill send you link, when iv done them. anythin you think could be improved, please send me a message --Stargate TL1 (talk) (Contribs) 19:48, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

Dr. Jackson webipsodes?
would you class da 'Dr. Jackson on the Ancients' and other shorts as webisodes? i know these wouldnt come under the Kino Webisodes umbrellia, but possible Dr. Jackson Jackson's webisodes? i dont if im honest?

--Stargate TL1 (talk) (Contribs) 19:45, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * Eh, probably not. They're not really webisodes, per say, as they were shown on the show. And,there's really not we could do with them if we gave each of them their own individual article. I mean, it's only him standing behind a desk talking about things we already have articles on here.—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 19:49, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

ye, dats what i wz thinkin. i just felt like we should do somethin with them, or atleast note them somewhere. thanks for your reply --Stargate TL1 (talk) (Contribs) 19:53, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

your help
thanks for your help with Kino webisode. iv given each a brief summery, which people can improve as we go along. im never dat good at written summary or plots. ill add qoutes, starring characters tomorrow. at least they are up and running :)
 * Thank you too. That was quite a bit of work we both did. The webisode articles looks nice :) —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 01:45, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

yep it was, but it never seems like alot of work when you start somethin like this :) well im gonna crash cuz its 2am here. nite --Stargate TL1 (talk) (Contribs) 01:54, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

Hey
I'll download Air, Part 3 tonight and work on an image tomorrow. Also, if you haven't done so yet, please log into your Gateworld forum account as I've left you a message. Cheers. - 07:17, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I really didn't want you to have to go out of your way. But, if you are, thanks!—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 07:22, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
 * No trouble, I want to have every episode anyways, this is just an excuse to grab #3. Cheers. - 07:47, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

bulletpoint
why do we put bulletpoints like that? just so i format things correctly in da future. regards --Stargate TL1 (talk) (Contribs) 19:33, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
 * Lanteans are an "offshoot" (so to speak) of the Ancient. Doing that with bullet points shows that they're the same race, but just a different group of people. We do the same thing with the Tau'ri, and have the Destiny expedition be an offshoot of that.—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 19:36, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

right i understand. ill undo my Kino error now. thanks for explainin --Stargate TL1 (talk) (Contribs) 19:38, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

Kino webisode 18
i cant find it released on the mgm stargate website, but kino webisode 18 has been released on youtube within the last 24 hours. incase you have'nt seen it, here is the link.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIYJiDDdP78.

Stargate Universe press kit
were would you put the """Stargate Universe press kit"""" in the Stargate wikia? it contains a character profile book and the pilot episodes (episodes 1-3). it was given to the press at advance screening. incase you have'nt seen the item, here is a link.... http://i.mediapundit.net/stargate-universe-press-kit/

--Stargate TL1 (talk) (Contribs) 17:57, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
 * I've known about it, it just really didn't seem like something we needed to have an article on. Um... feel free to make one though. We can shove it in the "Media" category.—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 02:31, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

Hello, iv added the Stargate Universe Press Kit to wikia. its not finished, but iv made a start. ill have to double check, but i think the DVDs include deleted/extended scenes, not showed in the original airing. feel free to make edit anythin --Stargate TL1 (talk) (Contribs) 22:47, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

Stargate Infinity
iv started to improve the stargate infinity format, so it matches the other tv series. ill finish and add pictures tomorrow. also some of the episodes are in the wrong order, and the air dates are also wrong. ill have it sorted in a couple days. iv noticed you have already double checked the things iv changed. thanks :) --Stargate TL1 (talk) (Contribs) 00:40, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks for taking care of that.—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 00:48, November 23, 2009 (UTC)

Stargate Infinity sidebar order
Hello, the Stargate Infinity episodes list in the sidebar is in the wrong order. could you please change, as i dont have access to this part of wikia. thankyou --Stargate TL1 (talk) (Contribs) 20:32, November 23, 2009 (UTC)

New Categories
These new categories are all over the place and this unregistered contributor is going too fast. I take fault for Ancient Domain (I don't think "Domain" should be capitalized). We also have Tok'ra Outpost, which I believe should be pluralized and lower-case "outposts" to fit with the standard of the other categories. It's a big mess. - 17:55, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, the Category:Goa'uld controlled. Are we going to list every planet that was at some point controlled by the Goa'uld? Because that's going to be nearly all of them. - 17:57, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * I know. It's a mess... The the "Goa'uld controlled" is a bad Idea as it is 99% of Milky Way planets. And you're correct about the grammar issue with plurals and such (like Category:Tok'ra Outpost and Category:Jaffa Planet). We should abolish the category "Goa'uld controlled" altogether. Or... (similar to what we should do with the Category:Ori controlled) changed it to "Formerly Goa'uld controlled).—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 18:07, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed, "formerly" sounds best. It's too bad we can't just rename the category and have every page in that category update to it. -
 * I know. You'd have thought that someone at wikia would have figured out how to do that. They seem to like to make changes that only serve to frustrate their users instead :) —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 18:28, November 27, 2009 (UTC)

OK I'm going to stop the category edits that I was doing until we figure out what to do. Here is what I propose:
 * Change Category:Ori controlled to Category:Formerly Ori controlled (or something of that nature)
 * Each of the current Goa'uld domain pages listed here, should be a category themselves that list the worlds formerly controlled by them. I updated Nirrti's domain and Ba'al's domain to demonstrate. By doing this, we'll cover all the pages that would be in the "Goa'uld controlled" category anyways, and it will be much more specific.
 * Planets that don't have a specific Goa'uld can go under the blanket Goa'uld domains category OR, we keep the "Goa'uld controlled" category and use it as a list of planets under goa'uld control, but not a specific goa'uld. - 18:33, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * All of that sounds good. For your last bullet, lets put them in "the blanket Goa'uld domains category". And... it seems like it should be "Formerly Ori-controlled planets" (although it is a bit long...)—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 18:39, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm having trouble with the Category:Jaffa Planet. I'm thinking "Jaffa-controlled planets" and making it a subcategory of Goa'uld Domain as Jaffa planets were also goa'uld planets. But they're really one in the same then. So... Although we could do "Free Jaffa planets"...—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 18:46, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * I think we can do one of two things: Put "Formerly" in every category title, or don't. I think we shouldn't, and then on each category page (where necessary), firmly and clearly state that these were planets formerly under so-and-so's control. If we put "Formerly" in the title of each category, then technically Category:Ba'al's domain should be "Category:Ba'al's former domain", which presents new problems and makes things more complicated.  My intention is to list planets as "formerly controlled" by the last known person/race that controlled them. That way, for instance, planet "Steve" doesn't have the categories "Apophis' former domain", "Anubis' former domain", "Nirrti's former domain" "Ba'al's former domain" because "Steve" was formerly controlled by all those people. It's only listed under "Ba'al's domain" as a former domain of Ba'al's as he was the last person to control it.  - 18:56, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * In response to the Jaffa-controlled planets, I think that should be separated from the Goa'uld, as it details the Jaffa resistance right? Therefore "Steve" would be categorized as "Ba'al's domain", "Jaffa-controlled planets" and if anyone clicks on those categories, they'll find that it was formerly controlled by Ba'al, and he was the last goa'uld to control it before the Jaffa won out. - 18:56, November 27, 2009 (UTC)