SGCommand:Nominations for featured articles

If you see an article that is, in your opinion, very good, then here is the place to nominate it to be featured article shown on the main page.

At this point, the nomination system is deliberately kept simple. The article with the most votes (at least 3) is removed from this pool and placed on the main page, and remains there until the next article is featured. There is no queue involved. If a nominee remains in the pool for more than 4 months with an insufficient number of votes, the nominee will be removed. It may, however, be nominated again.

Nominations
Please add new nominations at the bottom of the page.

When voting, you can vote For or Against (please provide a reason if voting against, and preferably if voting for as well). Or you can add a Comment without actually voting. You can vote for any number of entries at once, but only with one vote per entry.

You must be a registered user to vote. If you are an anonymous user, register now - it's fast and easy.

Anubis' mothership (-1)

 * Nominating and for. Just stumbled across this article and thought it was well written, detailed and informative. - - - 07:16, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
 * Against. tense is wrong sometimes, grammatical errors, awkward wording in places — 05:18, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Against. I, for one, find Anubis' mothership to be one of the more disappointing ships in the franchise. It's big, and powerful, and pretty cool, but the article is below par, we've never really had specifics, and it got destroyed a bunch. It was a plot accelerant, nothing more. Myrrlyn (talk) (Contribs) 12:10, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Larrin (+2)

 * Nominating and for. It's not getting any more detailed. - Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:07, May 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nominating. Very nice —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 07:33, May 8, 2010 (UTC)

Recently featured articles
This is an abbreviated archive of featured article nominations. For the complete archive, click here. Do not edit the sections below.

Lantean-Wraith war (+4)

 * Nominating and for. It was an importent events in interstellar history and thought it was well written and detailed. - 01:25 March 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * For. I agree with everything mentioned above
 * For. Backstory for all of Atlantis. How can it not be featured? Myrrlyn (talk) (Contribs) 12:05, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * for surprisingly it doesnt have npov issues 00:46, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Battle of the Void (+3)

 * Nominating and for. Another really detailed and descriptive battle article. Well-written, and it thoroughly describes one of the better battles in SGA... not to mention those images and quotes. It's all good... (my own bias aside)&mdash;Anubis 10545 01:31, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * For. Wow yeah i agree with Anubis.. very detailed article.... - - 07:19, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
 * For. --Donovan-j-charlie (talk) (Contribs) 15:21, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

Tau'ri-Wraith war (+3)

 * Nominating and For. Very well writen & detailed. -Blade Crimsonsun 02:24, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * For. Another great battle article.... - - 07:19, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
 * Nominating and For. Gives a nice overview... —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 18:32, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Jennifer Keller (+6)

 * Nominating and for. I built on it, described just about every action she took, even in episode where you only see her say "hi" and then walk away. Nominating it. -- Matthew R Dunn 20:09, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * For. I am a really big Dr. Keller fan, and the article is good. --KellerLover9178 13:20, November 2009 (UTC)
 * For. That is a pretty great article....—Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 19:41, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
 * For. Agreed, though I'm a bigger Beckett fan. - 19:55, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
 * For. A good article indeed. - Bell&#39;Orso (talk) (Contribs) 10:27, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * For. Rodney's lucky ;_; —Supakillaii (talk) (Contribs) 10:40, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

Air, Part 1 (+3)

 * Nominating and for. A really detailed article, images.... and all that stuff. Somewhere, I think Ka'lel suggested that having an SGU featured article soon after it premiered would be.... a good thing and might attract viewers. It's not just because I slaved over it for hours that I'm suggesting it mind you :) It really is one of our most detailed episode descriptions... and I'm not just saying that to make myself feel good... mind you :) —Anubis 10545 (talk) (Contribs) 00:11, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * For. Excellent work on the article, certainly has my vote, and I enjoyed reading it. Mind you I do notice some spelling errors, which would hopefully be taken care of. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) (Contribs) 01:03, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * For. Agreed for all the reasons above. Cheers. - 02:46, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

The Daedalus Variations (+3)

 * Nominating and for. I don't see anything saying episode guides aren't allowed, other wikis do it, so why don't we? Anyway, the episode is among one of the finest we have, fairly few images, good guide and some nice quotes. -- Matthew R Dunn 18:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * For. Sure, it's a descriptive, well-written... article of one of the better Atlantis episodes.&mdash;Anubis 10545 18:50, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * For. Great episode and well written article.-wraith runner

Battle of Atlantis (+3)

 * Nominating and for. A nicely constructed article that describes the battle that Atlantis' entire 1st season practically lead up to. (And of course I pretty much rewrote the entire article... so, might as well vote for it :) &mdash;Anubis 10545 23:52, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * For. Agree, Anubis has done some more fine work (though I just helped it along a little). -- Matthew R Dunn 00:28, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * For. Argeed, Very detailed and well writen. -- Blade Crimsonsun 15:56, 13 June 2009

Hive ships (+4)

 * Nominating and for. It's an awesome ship and a great article. —Swedish guy 09:29, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * For. It's a vital ship, as well as being one of the, if not the, largest ship in the franchise. -Maybourne 13:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * For. Anything to do with the wraith gets my attention. -bigchubbs99 11:28, 16 May 2009 (GMT)
 * For."Packed full of Jam" with info.&mdash;Anubis 10545 18:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Todd (+3)

 * Nominating and for. Very interesting to read with nice images.&mdash;Anubis 10545 05:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * For. Totally —Swedish guy 08:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * For. Great Article to read and great images —bigchubbs99 11:07, 24 April 2009

Trofsky (+5)

 * Nominating and for. Highly detailed for the two episodes he's been in, with some nice images. One of the nicer articles from early SG-1. -- Matthew R Dunn 16:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I wrote it, so I might as well vote for too. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 11:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * For. Wow, that's pretty impressive.&mdash;Anubis 10545 17:20, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * For. Incredibly well written article, especially for a character who was in so few episodes. Darth armitage 19:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * For. Good stuff. Green Tentacle (Talk) 01:59, 28 March 2009 (UTC)